Have to laugh. Despite these people purporting to support free speech, they block me from commenting on their guest book. Why? Well, God forbid anyone landing on their site should have any link to the truth.
But what made me laugh more tonight was the fact I did actually get putting comments there. For about five minutes. And then they realised it was me, posting the truth and each post I put was deleted.
But really, what sort of site is so scared shitless of the truth? Let me think. Clearly theirs.
Maybe it was my reference to a certain "saint" being in the same town as the Braying "ex-model"? Dumpsville. Word reached me about a certain marriage break up and whilst marriage break ups are not good, sometimes a wife has to do what wife has to do.
Still, might leave a said "saint" even more time to devote to a jailbird's wife or a flowery woman?
INTERESTING POINT: One thing their removing my comments within five minutes proves is that their guestbook is monitored, and thoroughly at that. This takes away ANY argument they might try to dredge up in defence of defamation posted there ~ THEY ACTIVELY NOT ONLY ALLOW IT, BUT ENCOURAGE IT.
UPDATE: Following this blog post I am now allowed to post!
Showing posts with label rate-your-solicitor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rate-your-solicitor. Show all posts
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
JUDGE JOHN O'HAGAN
From the Rate Your Solicitor site under the section about Judge O'Hagan:
"9th Oct 2009 Mrs. O'Connor
O'Hagan should stick to acting. The bench isn't the place for double standards or personalities. Let fairness and equality come to play before Sean McGlynn stains his robes forever. It suggests something is terribly wrong when a judge would bear the sins of a solicitor. What must he be afraid of, what does Mr. McGlynn have on the judge, it must be big."
Drama and intrigue! "stains his robes". "bear the sins of a solicitor". Shakespear must be turning in his grave!
But seriously, given the fact that another judge, Judge Edwards of the High Court, has upheld the decision of Judge John O'Hagan, and that another judge of the High Court held against Daniel and Elva Gallagher AGAINST Sean and Catherine McGlynn, is it even remotely possible that Mr. McGlynn as suggested has something on every single judge in Ireland?
This alone shows how ludicrous their entire site actually is.
"9th Oct 2009 Mrs. O'Connor
O'Hagan should stick to acting. The bench isn't the place for double standards or personalities. Let fairness and equality come to play before Sean McGlynn stains his robes forever. It suggests something is terribly wrong when a judge would bear the sins of a solicitor. What must he be afraid of, what does Mr. McGlynn have on the judge, it must be big."
Drama and intrigue! "stains his robes". "bear the sins of a solicitor". Shakespear must be turning in his grave!
But seriously, given the fact that another judge, Judge Edwards of the High Court, has upheld the decision of Judge John O'Hagan, and that another judge of the High Court held against Daniel and Elva Gallagher AGAINST Sean and Catherine McGlynn, is it even remotely possible that Mr. McGlynn as suggested has something on every single judge in Ireland?
This alone shows how ludicrous their entire site actually is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
