No, I have not misspelled the word in the title here.
Yesterday in the High Court in Dublin the High Court Judge, Justice Sean Ryan granted us an Isaac Wunder Order: "An Isaac Wunder order is an order issued by an Irish court restricting the ability of a vexatious litigant to institute legal proceedings without leave from that or another court, whether for a specified period of time or indefinitely. It is named after Isaac Wunder, an Irishman who became notorious for instituting a number of actions that were subsequently deemed by the court to be frivolous or vexatious.".
This Order prohibits Daniel Gallagher and Elva Gallagher, or either of them from instituting any further Court proceedings against us (Sean and Catherine McGlynn) or either of us without the leave or consent of the Court.
In other words if Daniel and/or Elva Gallagher decide they want to issue any more proceedings against either of us they must first apply to a Judge of the High Court for his or her consent to issue the proceedings. Effectively this means that the Court will have to be satisfied that the Gallaghers have reasonable grounds for issuing the proceedings and that there is some substance to the proceedings and they are not simply a repeat of the copious proceedings that already have been dealt with by the Court (on many occasions).
The Judge in his Judgement said Sean and Catherine McGlynn should not continue to be subjected to this Chinese Water Torture (referring to the drip drip nature of proceedings and documents).
The Order prevents the further abuse and harassment of us by the Gallaghers and prevents them from wasting any more valuable Court time ~ AND wasting the time of the Court staff who all have better things to do.
Needless to say being told enough is enough, the Gallaghers, and in particular Daniel lost the plot and reverted to the thug that he clearly is. Leaving the Court, just outside the Court door in fact, he harangued my husband threatening to punch his teeth down his throat.
He was stopped from actually punching my husband by none other than John Gill who clearly has a modicum of intelligence that Daniel Gallagher does not possess and knew that it would look very, very bad for Daniel and Elva Gallagher, not to mention the much depleted band who call themselves "Victims of the Legal Profession" if one of their members resorted to Neanderthal behaviour in front of anyone let alone in the High Court.
But his behaviour just typifies the mentality of the Daniel Gallagher. He is a man possessed and bereft of any degree of rationality and this, combined with his wife Elva's vastly inflated notion that she has any idea of the law is a dangerous combination. John Gill really should consider the company he keeps if he wants to keep the few remaining members of their "Society".
Showing posts with label rate your solicitor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rate your solicitor. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Saturday, October 6, 2012
BURSTING WITH INFO
Yes, yes, yes, I should have uploaded the review I did of John Gills "tome".
But in the past two weeks SO much information, not to mention movements, are upon us.
We have had information given to us about how Elva Gallagher and her husband Daniel Gallagher did VERY bad things to Madge Friel.
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a VERY bad person,
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a liar, a possible thief, and at the very least the instigator of law breaking activities on Madge Friel, the woman whom they lie about.
Keep up.
I will update.
But in the past two weeks SO much information, not to mention movements, are upon us.
We have had information given to us about how Elva Gallagher and her husband Daniel Gallagher did VERY bad things to Madge Friel.
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a VERY bad person,
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a liar, a possible thief, and at the very least the instigator of law breaking activities on Madge Friel, the woman whom they lie about.
Keep up.
I will update.
Monday, May 28, 2012
AND NOW WE LEARN WHO WAS POSTING
The great upshot of Damien Tansey winning his case against John Gill is that he has been given all data from the host of Rate Your Solicitor.com, dotster.com
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES UPDATED
Those who read this blog will be aware of my post about a member of "The Victims of the Legal Profession" contacting me by telephone and text numerous times. Yes, the person did spill a lot of the secrets of this ridiculous little band of people but the person then decided to get nasty.
Of course I reported this to the Gardai (Police) and it seems the pest is exactly the person I thought it was.
Now this person will have to think a little before they decide to abuse anyone by phone again.
I will reveal more at a later date.
In the meantime, anyone who did not see the initial post can catch up HERE.
Of course I reported this to the Gardai (Police) and it seems the pest is exactly the person I thought it was.
Now this person will have to think a little before they decide to abuse anyone by phone again.
I will reveal more at a later date.
In the meantime, anyone who did not see the initial post can catch up HERE.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
THESE PEOPLE ACTUALLY SUPPORT THREATINGING A BABY
After you read the following and what they are doing with my baby grandchild, scroll down to the end to see what they did on their guestbook when I tried to post. (Updates to this post can be seen at the end of it).
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
TANSEY -V- GILL: HIGH COURT ORDER
Further to my post here "DAMIEN TANSEY -V- JOHN GILL: IGNORING THE LAW" where I told how John Gill openly ignored the High Court Order imposed on him by Judge Michael Peart in the High Court, (a fact I only learned thanks to the texts I was receiving from one of their group who is not as loyal to them as they think ~ TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES explains this), the guestbook on the crookedlawyerss.com site openly gives links to the rateyoursolicitor.com site:
"access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost. com/ "
and:
"opps made a mistake Access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost.com/ "
I have removed the number code for posting here but the above two posts appear with the full link code to rateyoursolicitor.com on the crookedlawyers.com guestbook.
John Gill and his loyal (and some not so loyal) followers display, at the very least, an extremely cavalier attitude to the law in Ireland.
"access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost. com/ "
and:
"opps made a mistake Access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost.com/ "
I have removed the number code for posting here but the above two posts appear with the full link code to rateyoursolicitor.com on the crookedlawyers.com guestbook.
John Gill and his loyal (and some not so loyal) followers display, at the very least, an extremely cavalier attitude to the law in Ireland.
Friday, February 10, 2012
TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES
FRIDAY 10 FEBRUARY 2012
I have been receiving a lot of text messages from a core insider of the VLPS group. Many of the texts gave "insider" information that only a person very closely linked to them could know.
It all started with a phone call in the very early hours of Christmas Day last which as you can imagine caused a bit of a fright to receive a telephone call so early on Christmas morning. Following that telephone call, I was contacted on numerous occasions thereafter via text messages.
The texts continued over the course of the last six weeks with various snippets of information on the main people involved in the VLPS.
They culminated, after copious texting yesterday, with abusive and very threatening text messages into the very early hours of this morning.
Incidentally, prior to the texts taking a very serious downturn this morning, I had had no intention to post them here.
All the text from the very first one are currently being transcribed and I will add them here shortly.
UPDATE. In the interim, a photo of my (very battered) mobile phone showing a recent text from the VLPS insider to me informing me that despite the High Court Order of Justice Michael Peart (Tansey -v- Gill), the site was still online. NB: Obviously I have blocked out the texters mobile number at the top of the texters post to me.
I have been receiving a lot of text messages from a core insider of the VLPS group. Many of the texts gave "insider" information that only a person very closely linked to them could know.
It all started with a phone call in the very early hours of Christmas Day last which as you can imagine caused a bit of a fright to receive a telephone call so early on Christmas morning. Following that telephone call, I was contacted on numerous occasions thereafter via text messages.
The texts continued over the course of the last six weeks with various snippets of information on the main people involved in the VLPS.
They culminated, after copious texting yesterday, with abusive and very threatening text messages into the very early hours of this morning.
Incidentally, prior to the texts taking a very serious downturn this morning, I had had no intention to post them here.
All the text from the very first one are currently being transcribed and I will add them here shortly.
UPDATE. In the interim, a photo of my (very battered) mobile phone showing a recent text from the VLPS insider to me informing me that despite the High Court Order of Justice Michael Peart (Tansey -v- Gill), the site was still online. NB: Obviously I have blocked out the texters mobile number at the top of the texters post to me.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
DAMIEN TANSEY -V- JOHN GILL: IGNORING THE LAW
John Gill (St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin) truly is a law unto himself. Despite the Order handed down by Justice Michael Peart (Judge of High Court, Ireland) recently, an Order directing that the websites (rate your solicitor and crooked lawyers) be removed pending the full hearing of the case on the 22nd of February next, John Gill is openly posting away on the crookedlawyers.com guestbook. As are others. And on that guestbook there are a number of posts giving a dotster coded link to rateyoursolicior.com
Firstly, from the Irish Times 2nd February 2012
"In his ruling, Mr Justice Peart said he would grant mandatory injunctions, pending the full hearing of the action, against Mr Gill, Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co Clare, and Ms Vogelaar, Parklands, Westport, Co Mayo, requiring them to terminate the operation of the website.
The defendants were also ordered to remove material posted about Mr Tansey on the website and to refrain from publishing further defamatory material about him. They must also deliver up the names and addresses of all those involved in the posting of defamatory material, plus details about those who operated the site."
Now, from the crookedlawyers.com guestbook on the 2nd February 2012 (after the mandatory injunction) and posted by John Gill (at 16:19:37):
"In my absence High Court Micheal Peart gave his Judgment in The High Court in Dublin yesterday 31st day of January 2012.
Judge Micheal Peart did make some skit remarks in relation to me John Gill helping Vulnerable Citizens caught up in Insurance and Medical Fraud; Remarks that were not published in the Irish Independent or The Irish Times news papers today 1/2/2012.
Judge Micheal Peart did not mention the Fact that this Case; Solicitor Damien Tansey V John was brought to an abrupt end and or a sudden end when the TRUTH about Damien Tansey began to Smell all over the Court Room.
Was Judge Micheal Peart scared that I would mention the fact that I was told by Sligo Business people that Judge Micheal Peart was wined and dined by Solicitor Damien Tansey in Sligo.
Go out and get a Copy of the Irish Times and the Irish Independents worped (sp) version of Solicitor Damien Tansey and Barrister Richard Humphreys Defamation Lible and Slander against John Gill which Truth will appear on the Streets of Ireland and the wider World. The un-reported (sp) in this case will be fully exposed.; FAXED to all interested Victims.
John Gill 1/2/2012"
So once again Mr. Gill totally ignores the law. The guestbook is up and running and has postings all the way through and up to date, the mandatory injunction being totally ignored. (By the way, this: "In my absence High Court Micheal Peart gave his Judgment in The High Court in Dublin yesterday 31st day of January 2012.". In his absence? In his absence?! Where was he? Outside being clapped on the back by his supporters? Typing up the above? In the gents fashioning his Brillo-pad? HOW on earth could a legal little wig like Mr. Gill miss such an important appearance?).
Back to his posting on the guestbook (after the Judgement of the High Court). His followers will think this shows the strength of the man, other, more rational people, will think it shows the lunacy of the man. In his blind fury, hate, bitterness and absolute belief in himself, substantially caused by the fawning by his four or five most devoted robots and his adoring Elva, he has long since parted company with any rationality he may once have possessed. But you can sort of understand how a stupid person would feel this way given the following post from one his most devoted followers, Michael Bradshaw (posted 1/2/12 at 15:36:28):
"The Entire Case before Mr Justice Michael Peart was 'rigged' from start to finish". (Just what is it with these people and the inappropriate use of capital letters?)
So if things don't go exactly the way these people want, everything is "rigged". Which, when you think about it, sums up the ethos of this group.
John Gill is totally Machiavellian to his core: "cunning, scheming, and unscrupulous, esp. in politics or in advancing one's career" ... and ... "a cunning, amoral, and opportunist person"). and sees only his cause, his needs, his stand on things.
But of course he is not alone as evidenced by other VERY frequent posters on their guestbook, The Gallaghers (John's close friend and almost constant companion, Elva and her jail-bird husband Daniel), Michale Bradshaw (it is he who canonised John Gill naming him St. John ~ how is that for absolute devotion?), Eugene Cafferky and of course, the copy and paste king himself, Joe Ferris. Just whiz through their copious postings and you will see their own gripe again, and again, and again.
Another post highlights John Gill's total lack of control and stupidity and his firm belief that he is beyond the law. Read this and wonder at how any person could be just so sure of his ability and might (albeit misguided) and read too the bordering on insane rantings displaying clear psychopathic traits (psychopath: "one who is: manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse").
Regarding these tendencies John Gill displays, I have serious concerns in relation to the fact that these tendencies are ably and passionately supported by Joe Ferris, who is lecturer in nursing ("I have been working as a mental health nurse from September 1969 and at present I am employed as Nurse Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing at University of Ulster, School of Nursing, Magee Campus, L/Derry.").
Posted by John Gill 5/2/12 at 17:09:32
"At 2.10pm on the 3rd day of February 2012 I received from Solicitor Damien Tansey The Judgement of Judge Micheal Peart. . ; and I Quote;
You will find enclosed Certified copy Judgment of Mr Justice Peart delivered on Tuesday 31st January 2012 ; end of story.
I am now in possession of The Judgment of Judge Micheal Peart without the case being heard, The Judgment also states that I John Gill have no possible chance of winning against Damien Tansey.
This Judgement is a Joke & a Total FRAUD. Full Stop
Judge Micheal Peart did not allow the Case to be Complete.
Judge Micheal Peart brought the Case to an Abrupt end as I John Gill was telling the TRUTH about Damien Tanseys Conduct.
I, asked Judge Micheal Peart for an ORDER for Discovery of Documents and was told to seek Voluntary Discovery and if that failed that he Judge Peart would give me a Court ORDER for Discovery.
The Judgment states that I can not take the Law into my own hands, and explains the Mechanisms available,
I John Gill have availed of the Mechanisms and will produce the Documented Evidence of six months and more with Garda Bureau of FRAUD Investigation Detectives in Shannon Garda Station and Harcourt Street Fraud Detectives, and the Courts; and Judges; Interferred with the findings; The Irish Land Registry Officials,Solicitors and Barristers Forged Documents against Court ORDERS to coverup and Steal my Property.
The Law Society of Ireland aided and abetted Fraud Corruption,Perjury, Forgery, Perverting the Course of Justice, Interferring (sp)with due Process of the Courts.
Judge Micheal Peart refused to take a copy of my book. (Imagine!)
Barrister Richard Humphreys, a Lecturer I believe in Dublin City University is in possession of my book which details many years if Research and Investigation of Fraud and Corruption by Judges,Barristers and Solicitors;
Failed Barristers and Solicitors and may I say Corrupt Baristers (sp) and Solicitors are costing Ireland ; Now the E.C.B. I.M.F. and British Taxpayers Multi-Millions of Euro. with no end in sight.
I, told Judge Micheal Peart on day one of my Court Hearing that I had written a book and had named Thirty Three Judges in my Book.
Judge Micheal Peart told me John Gill and The Court that he Judge Micheal Peart did not want to be the Thirty Fourth Judge Named.
Judge Micheal Peart I, believe was forced by the Combined Barristers Union and The Law Society of Ireland at a meeting behind closed doors that he Judge Micheal Peart had to toe the line & was bound by the Secret Oath and not by the Law and The Irish Constitution or The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; I.E. THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE. The world is listening and watching and I am waiting for Judge Micheal Peart to give me an ORDER for Discovery of Documents which is vital to the successful Conclusion of this case.
John Gill 5/2/2012"
And from the above, this: "The world is listening and watching". Add deluded to psychopathic and you have the Brillo-pad haired little man to a T.
Firstly, from the Irish Times 2nd February 2012
"In his ruling, Mr Justice Peart said he would grant mandatory injunctions, pending the full hearing of the action, against Mr Gill, Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co Clare, and Ms Vogelaar, Parklands, Westport, Co Mayo, requiring them to terminate the operation of the website.
The defendants were also ordered to remove material posted about Mr Tansey on the website and to refrain from publishing further defamatory material about him. They must also deliver up the names and addresses of all those involved in the posting of defamatory material, plus details about those who operated the site."
Now, from the crookedlawyers.com guestbook on the 2nd February 2012 (after the mandatory injunction) and posted by John Gill (at 16:19:37):
"In my absence High Court Micheal Peart gave his Judgment in The High Court in Dublin yesterday 31st day of January 2012.
Judge Micheal Peart did make some skit remarks in relation to me John Gill helping Vulnerable Citizens caught up in Insurance and Medical Fraud; Remarks that were not published in the Irish Independent or The Irish Times news papers today 1/2/2012.
Judge Micheal Peart did not mention the Fact that this Case; Solicitor Damien Tansey V John was brought to an abrupt end and or a sudden end when the TRUTH about Damien Tansey began to Smell all over the Court Room.
Was Judge Micheal Peart scared that I would mention the fact that I was told by Sligo Business people that Judge Micheal Peart was wined and dined by Solicitor Damien Tansey in Sligo.
Go out and get a Copy of the Irish Times and the Irish Independents worped (sp) version of Solicitor Damien Tansey and Barrister Richard Humphreys Defamation Lible and Slander against John Gill which Truth will appear on the Streets of Ireland and the wider World. The un-reported (sp) in this case will be fully exposed.; FAXED to all interested Victims.
John Gill 1/2/2012"
So once again Mr. Gill totally ignores the law. The guestbook is up and running and has postings all the way through and up to date, the mandatory injunction being totally ignored. (By the way, this: "In my absence High Court Micheal Peart gave his Judgment in The High Court in Dublin yesterday 31st day of January 2012.". In his absence? In his absence?! Where was he? Outside being clapped on the back by his supporters? Typing up the above? In the gents fashioning his Brillo-pad? HOW on earth could a legal little wig like Mr. Gill miss such an important appearance?).
Back to his posting on the guestbook (after the Judgement of the High Court). His followers will think this shows the strength of the man, other, more rational people, will think it shows the lunacy of the man. In his blind fury, hate, bitterness and absolute belief in himself, substantially caused by the fawning by his four or five most devoted robots and his adoring Elva, he has long since parted company with any rationality he may once have possessed. But you can sort of understand how a stupid person would feel this way given the following post from one his most devoted followers, Michael Bradshaw (posted 1/2/12 at 15:36:28):
"The Entire Case before Mr Justice Michael Peart was 'rigged' from start to finish". (Just what is it with these people and the inappropriate use of capital letters?)
So if things don't go exactly the way these people want, everything is "rigged". Which, when you think about it, sums up the ethos of this group.
John Gill is totally Machiavellian to his core: "cunning, scheming, and unscrupulous, esp. in politics or in advancing one's career" ... and ... "a cunning, amoral, and opportunist person"). and sees only his cause, his needs, his stand on things.
But of course he is not alone as evidenced by other VERY frequent posters on their guestbook, The Gallaghers (John's close friend and almost constant companion, Elva and her jail-bird husband Daniel), Michale Bradshaw (it is he who canonised John Gill naming him St. John ~ how is that for absolute devotion?), Eugene Cafferky and of course, the copy and paste king himself, Joe Ferris. Just whiz through their copious postings and you will see their own gripe again, and again, and again.
Another post highlights John Gill's total lack of control and stupidity and his firm belief that he is beyond the law. Read this and wonder at how any person could be just so sure of his ability and might (albeit misguided) and read too the bordering on insane rantings displaying clear psychopathic traits (psychopath: "one who is: manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse").
Regarding these tendencies John Gill displays, I have serious concerns in relation to the fact that these tendencies are ably and passionately supported by Joe Ferris, who is lecturer in nursing ("I have been working as a mental health nurse from September 1969 and at present I am employed as Nurse Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing at University of Ulster, School of Nursing, Magee Campus, L/Derry.").
Posted by John Gill 5/2/12 at 17:09:32
"At 2.10pm on the 3rd day of February 2012 I received from Solicitor Damien Tansey The Judgement of Judge Micheal Peart. . ; and I Quote;
You will find enclosed Certified copy Judgment of Mr Justice Peart delivered on Tuesday 31st January 2012 ; end of story.
I am now in possession of The Judgment of Judge Micheal Peart without the case being heard, The Judgment also states that I John Gill have no possible chance of winning against Damien Tansey.
This Judgement is a Joke & a Total FRAUD. Full Stop
Judge Micheal Peart did not allow the Case to be Complete.
Judge Micheal Peart brought the Case to an Abrupt end as I John Gill was telling the TRUTH about Damien Tanseys Conduct.
I, asked Judge Micheal Peart for an ORDER for Discovery of Documents and was told to seek Voluntary Discovery and if that failed that he Judge Peart would give me a Court ORDER for Discovery.
The Judgment states that I can not take the Law into my own hands, and explains the Mechanisms available,
I John Gill have availed of the Mechanisms and will produce the Documented Evidence of six months and more with Garda Bureau of FRAUD Investigation Detectives in Shannon Garda Station and Harcourt Street Fraud Detectives, and the Courts; and Judges; Interferred with the findings; The Irish Land Registry Officials,Solicitors and Barristers Forged Documents against Court ORDERS to coverup and Steal my Property.
The Law Society of Ireland aided and abetted Fraud Corruption,Perjury, Forgery, Perverting the Course of Justice, Interferring (sp)with due Process of the Courts.
Judge Micheal Peart refused to take a copy of my book. (Imagine!)
Barrister Richard Humphreys, a Lecturer I believe in Dublin City University is in possession of my book which details many years if Research and Investigation of Fraud and Corruption by Judges,Barristers and Solicitors;
Failed Barristers and Solicitors and may I say Corrupt Baristers (sp) and Solicitors are costing Ireland ; Now the E.C.B. I.M.F. and British Taxpayers Multi-Millions of Euro. with no end in sight.
I, told Judge Micheal Peart on day one of my Court Hearing that I had written a book and had named Thirty Three Judges in my Book.
Judge Micheal Peart told me John Gill and The Court that he Judge Micheal Peart did not want to be the Thirty Fourth Judge Named.
Judge Micheal Peart I, believe was forced by the Combined Barristers Union and The Law Society of Ireland at a meeting behind closed doors that he Judge Micheal Peart had to toe the line & was bound by the Secret Oath and not by the Law and The Irish Constitution or The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; I.E. THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE. The world is listening and watching and I am waiting for Judge Micheal Peart to give me an ORDER for Discovery of Documents which is vital to the successful Conclusion of this case.
John Gill 5/2/2012"
And from the above, this: "The world is listening and watching". Add deluded to psychopathic and you have the Brillo-pad haired little man to a T.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
VLPS GUESTBOOK
Have to laugh. Despite these people purporting to support free speech, they block me from commenting on their guest book. Why? Well, God forbid anyone landing on their site should have any link to the truth.
But what made me laugh more tonight was the fact I did actually get putting comments there. For about five minutes. And then they realised it was me, posting the truth and each post I put was deleted.
But really, what sort of site is so scared shitless of the truth? Let me think. Clearly theirs.
Maybe it was my reference to a certain "saint" being in the same town as the Braying "ex-model"? Dumpsville. Word reached me about a certain marriage break up and whilst marriage break ups are not good, sometimes a wife has to do what wife has to do.
Still, might leave a said "saint" even more time to devote to a jailbird's wife or a flowery woman?
INTERESTING POINT: One thing their removing my comments within five minutes proves is that their guestbook is monitored, and thoroughly at that. This takes away ANY argument they might try to dredge up in defence of defamation posted there ~ THEY ACTIVELY NOT ONLY ALLOW IT, BUT ENCOURAGE IT.
UPDATE: Following this blog post I am now allowed to post!
But what made me laugh more tonight was the fact I did actually get putting comments there. For about five minutes. And then they realised it was me, posting the truth and each post I put was deleted.
But really, what sort of site is so scared shitless of the truth? Let me think. Clearly theirs.
Maybe it was my reference to a certain "saint" being in the same town as the Braying "ex-model"? Dumpsville. Word reached me about a certain marriage break up and whilst marriage break ups are not good, sometimes a wife has to do what wife has to do.
Still, might leave a said "saint" even more time to devote to a jailbird's wife or a flowery woman?
INTERESTING POINT: One thing their removing my comments within five minutes proves is that their guestbook is monitored, and thoroughly at that. This takes away ANY argument they might try to dredge up in defence of defamation posted there ~ THEY ACTIVELY NOT ONLY ALLOW IT, BUT ENCOURAGE IT.
UPDATE: Following this blog post I am now allowed to post!
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
MARGARET O'KANE
This person, Margaret O'Kane, who posts prolifically on the cesspit sites of VLPS (crookedlawyers.com and rateyoursolicitor.com) and purports to have a bed and breakfast in Dunkineely is, in my opinion, not a real person. "She" continually castigates me as a holiday home owner and yet this person seems not to exist.
There is NO-ONE in Dunkineely called Margaret O'Kane.
Google for bed and breakfast in Dunkineely and you will come up with nothing.
Margaret O'Kane in one post, defending my saying there was no such bed and breakfast owner, said something like 'oh, I must have been running a dog kennel for the past 20 years'. Dog kennel, run by a female? I hesitate to as that that would be a bitch.
But here's the deal.
If you, Margaret O'Kane, are real then let's meet face to face.
You (clearly) know who I am and where I live.
To you I throw down the challenge.
Tell me where to meet you and meet you I will. Face to face.
And if you ignore this, then I can only assume you are just another of the bogus posters, a figment of John Gill's limited imagination.
WATCH HERE FOR UPDATES PEOPLE.
And readers, check the Voters Roll for County Donegal and the name Margaret O'Kane http://www.donegal.ie/ereg/default.aspx
For MARGARET O'KANE, DUNKINEELY this is the result:
"Your Details could not be found. There are a few possible reasons : You are not on the Register of Electors
Fill in form RFA2 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
You are on the Register of Electors, but your details are incorrect
If you were previously on the Register Of Electors, but have changed address :
Fill in form RFA3 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
If your information is incorrect :
Please call Donegal County Councilon 074 9172238
Alternatively, try changing your search criteria and searching again.
Remember, if your house has a number, you must enter it.
SO, Margaret O'Kane, do step forward. Or John Gill just stop wearing ladies clothing and disguising yourself as Margaret O'Kane!
There is NO-ONE in Dunkineely called Margaret O'Kane.
Google for bed and breakfast in Dunkineely and you will come up with nothing.
Margaret O'Kane in one post, defending my saying there was no such bed and breakfast owner, said something like 'oh, I must have been running a dog kennel for the past 20 years'. Dog kennel, run by a female? I hesitate to as that that would be a bitch.
But here's the deal.
If you, Margaret O'Kane, are real then let's meet face to face.
You (clearly) know who I am and where I live.
To you I throw down the challenge.
Tell me where to meet you and meet you I will. Face to face.
And if you ignore this, then I can only assume you are just another of the bogus posters, a figment of John Gill's limited imagination.
WATCH HERE FOR UPDATES PEOPLE.
And readers, check the Voters Roll for County Donegal and the name Margaret O'Kane http://www.donegal.ie/ereg/default.aspx
For MARGARET O'KANE, DUNKINEELY this is the result:
"Your Details could not be found. There are a few possible reasons : You are not on the Register of Electors
Fill in form RFA2 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
You are on the Register of Electors, but your details are incorrect
If you were previously on the Register Of Electors, but have changed address :
Fill in form RFA3 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
If your information is incorrect :
Please call Donegal County Councilon 074 9172238
Alternatively, try changing your search criteria and searching again.
Remember, if your house has a number, you must enter it.
SO, Margaret O'Kane, do step forward. Or John Gill just stop wearing ladies clothing and disguising yourself as Margaret O'Kane!
Monday, November 21, 2011
THE STALKING STUPIDS
Honestly, these people from rateyoursolicitor and crookedlawyers (VLPS) are beyond stupid.
They stalk me all over the internet, obsessed as they are with me. They really should consider getting a life that does not include me.
Today, once again they tried to join a forum I am a member of, once again using a ridiculous user name and proxy (poxy?) IP address. This once again exemplifies their supreme stupidity.
To those idiots: YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MY LOVELY FORUM.
Go elsewhere and see if you can find a life. Of sorts.
They stalk me all over the internet, obsessed as they are with me. They really should consider getting a life that does not include me.
Today, once again they tried to join a forum I am a member of, once again using a ridiculous user name and proxy (poxy?) IP address. This once again exemplifies their supreme stupidity.
To those idiots: YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MY LOVELY FORUM.
Go elsewhere and see if you can find a life. Of sorts.
Friday, November 18, 2011
BREEDING PUPS
I noticed a post their cesspit site (vlps/crookedlawyers.com) saying I was running a puppy farm, breeding pups for sale.
This is just another of their nasty lies.
1. We have NEVER bought a pup from a puppy farm nor a pet shop.
2. All the dogs we have had were bought as pups from reputable breeders whom we had checked out at length prior to purchasing. By checking out, we made sure that they were Kennel Club (either Irish or British) registered, not because that is a total safety valve, but rather that we could see how many litters they had bred from their dogs and how regularly.
3. We have had many pedigree dogs over the years and have NEVER bred as much as one pup. My opinion is that there are far too many dogs in the world as it is and that is the reason I have never had our dogs bred. And believe me, were I the type to do it, I would have made quite a sum of money as they were all expensive dogs.
4. We have never even allowed our male pedigree dogs to be used at stud. Our Shar-Pei at the time could have earned £800 per breeding and although we were asked by owners in Galway to use our dog, we refused because we a) did not buy our Shar-Pei to make money and b) as stated previously there are far too many puppies being bred.
5. Our dog now is an English Bull Terrier and we have had him now for over seven years. We had him neutered when he was a few months old despite the fact that he could be used at stud as an adult for up to £1,000 a time.
So, no, we have never had a puppy farm and have never bought from one, and more, have never even seen a puppy farm (other than TV progs. of course).
But just another example of the hate campaign and lies against us on their cesspit sites.
To end on a happy note though, here's our fabulous Alf. A charming, loving, clever and very loyal eight stone mass of solid muscle.
This is just another of their nasty lies.
1. We have NEVER bought a pup from a puppy farm nor a pet shop.
2. All the dogs we have had were bought as pups from reputable breeders whom we had checked out at length prior to purchasing. By checking out, we made sure that they were Kennel Club (either Irish or British) registered, not because that is a total safety valve, but rather that we could see how many litters they had bred from their dogs and how regularly.
3. We have had many pedigree dogs over the years and have NEVER bred as much as one pup. My opinion is that there are far too many dogs in the world as it is and that is the reason I have never had our dogs bred. And believe me, were I the type to do it, I would have made quite a sum of money as they were all expensive dogs.
4. We have never even allowed our male pedigree dogs to be used at stud. Our Shar-Pei at the time could have earned £800 per breeding and although we were asked by owners in Galway to use our dog, we refused because we a) did not buy our Shar-Pei to make money and b) as stated previously there are far too many puppies being bred.
5. Our dog now is an English Bull Terrier and we have had him now for over seven years. We had him neutered when he was a few months old despite the fact that he could be used at stud as an adult for up to £1,000 a time.
So, no, we have never had a puppy farm and have never bought from one, and more, have never even seen a puppy farm (other than TV progs. of course).
But just another example of the hate campaign and lies against us on their cesspit sites.
To end on a happy note though, here's our fabulous Alf. A charming, loving, clever and very loyal eight stone mass of solid muscle.
 |
| Alf says "hello" |
Friday, November 11, 2011
A SERIOUS WARNING TO VISITORS TO THE VLPS SITE
I just noticed something on the VLPS/crookedlawyers.com website that I think anyone considering entering their "chat room" should seriously consider the following prior to entering there.
Do you trust these people?
Do you mind if they can, by your using their chat room ~ even just to look at it ~ enter YOUR computer? Maybe collect information from your computer? Perhaps install software on your computer without your consent?
If the answer to any of these is 'no', as it should be given that you may have private information such as bank details, passwords, and so on stored there, then do not enter there.
How do I know this?
Simple really. If, on their homepage, you scroll down the list of option (Contents) to click on, you will see near the bottom this:
"Chat with other users of this site" (Inviting you to join in chat or read things written there).
If you click on this, this alone comes up:
"This chat application requires Java support."
Absolutely NO warning about their using Active-X, which should be there to let YOU decide if you trust these people. Hardly surprising they don't bother to warn you I suppose.
By the way, you will know they use Active-X if you have adequate protection on your computer as a pop-up blocker will appear which gives you the following information:
"What is an ActiveX control?
ActiveX controls and web browser add-ons
These programs can malfunction, however, or give you content you don't want.
In some cases, these programs can be used to collect information from your computer in ways you might not approve of, possibly damage information on your computer, install software on your computer without your consent, or allow someone else to control your computer remotely.
Given these risks, you should only install ActiveX controls or add-ons if you completely trust the publisher and the website offering it."
Once again we see just how underhand and sneaky these people truly are. And the scary thing is, just how much information have they harvested from people who have entered their chat room?
You have been warned.
Do you trust these people?
Do you mind if they can, by your using their chat room ~ even just to look at it ~ enter YOUR computer? Maybe collect information from your computer? Perhaps install software on your computer without your consent?
If the answer to any of these is 'no', as it should be given that you may have private information such as bank details, passwords, and so on stored there, then do not enter there.
How do I know this?
Simple really. If, on their homepage, you scroll down the list of option (Contents) to click on, you will see near the bottom this:
"Chat with other users of this site" (Inviting you to join in chat or read things written there).
If you click on this, this alone comes up:
"This chat application requires Java support."
Absolutely NO warning about their using Active-X, which should be there to let YOU decide if you trust these people. Hardly surprising they don't bother to warn you I suppose.
By the way, you will know they use Active-X if you have adequate protection on your computer as a pop-up blocker will appear which gives you the following information:
"What is an ActiveX control?
ActiveX controls and web browser add-ons
These programs can malfunction, however, or give you content you don't want.
In some cases, these programs can be used to collect information from your computer in ways you might not approve of, possibly damage information on your computer, install software on your computer without your consent, or allow someone else to control your computer remotely.
Given these risks, you should only install ActiveX controls or add-ons if you completely trust the publisher and the website offering it."
Once again we see just how underhand and sneaky these people truly are. And the scary thing is, just how much information have they harvested from people who have entered their chat room?
You have been warned.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
"A NASTY, SCRUFFY, HORRIBLE, LITTLE BULLY"
From the VLPS/crookedlawers guestbook:
"Date: 21/10/2011, 19:56:16 ~ Name: Truth ~ Number: 3,091
Have Victims of The Legal Profession become Victims of John Gill.
The VLPS has been taken control of by a Nasty Scruffy Horrible Little Bully.
The dysfunctionality of The VLPS a victims support group is extrordinary. This guestbook controlled with messages regularly removed, The Rate Your Solicitor Site closed to new postings, public meetings for victims prohibited, no membership registration, no democratically elected management structure, not a single AGM in 10 years and not one genuine victim assisted through the courts to a successful outcome.
Who is John Gill and why is he controlling The VLPS ? ? ?."
Dear Truth
Of course they are all victims of John Gill. But the site has not been taken control of by him, the site is owned, run and more importantly, controlled by him.
John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin), with his friend and close companion, Elva Gallagher, only really want to bang, albeit impotently, their own drums. They care not a jot about other members there other than to take a few quid off them (tax free of course).
Sadly, there are people out there who are innocent enough to actually think this little man can do anything for them. Well, other than land a few of them in jail ~ himself included ~ that is.
John Gill has got exactly nowhere in his own quest to right what he perceives as wrongs against him and now he has the added bother of someone pursuing him for his slanderous rantings. His cup positively overflows.
But he is not totally alone. He always has constant companion and close friend Elva (wife of Daniel Gallagher) but he also has a few "birds of a feather" around him.
People, some of whom are almost illiterate (as evidenced by their writings on his guestbook), and people too who will jump on any bandwagon going to tear others apart ~ as long, of course, as they have the anonymity of the internet and a screen in front of them.
These people, his little band of followers, worship the ground he prances around on as he continues his quest for victory, old, saggy, wrinkly thing by his side (I refer here not to his close friend and constant companion Elva, but rather, his large satchel) over every person and every organisation that ever slighted him in any way. The fact that some of these slights may be figments of his florid imagination is neither here nor there to John Gill.
He is a little man with many big chips scattered between and on both shoulders and a little man who will not give up, driven as he is by his own demons, and cheered on by said band of followers. Some of whom are starting to wonder exactly what they got into when they first believed his diatribes.
But "a nasty, scruffy, horrible little bully"? Well, people can make up their own minds on whether that is a close despcription of him or not.
I tend to think of him as a sad, little man to whom both life and mother nature have dealt some hard blows and because of these he can no longer think, speak nor work with any semblence of rationality.
"Date: 21/10/2011, 19:56:16 ~ Name: Truth ~ Number: 3,091
Have Victims of The Legal Profession become Victims of John Gill.
The VLPS has been taken control of by a Nasty Scruffy Horrible Little Bully.
The dysfunctionality of The VLPS a victims support group is extrordinary. This guestbook controlled with messages regularly removed, The Rate Your Solicitor Site closed to new postings, public meetings for victims prohibited, no membership registration, no democratically elected management structure, not a single AGM in 10 years and not one genuine victim assisted through the courts to a successful outcome.
Who is John Gill and why is he controlling The VLPS ? ? ?."
Dear Truth
Of course they are all victims of John Gill. But the site has not been taken control of by him, the site is owned, run and more importantly, controlled by him.
John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin), with his friend and close companion, Elva Gallagher, only really want to bang, albeit impotently, their own drums. They care not a jot about other members there other than to take a few quid off them (tax free of course).
Sadly, there are people out there who are innocent enough to actually think this little man can do anything for them. Well, other than land a few of them in jail ~ himself included ~ that is.
John Gill has got exactly nowhere in his own quest to right what he perceives as wrongs against him and now he has the added bother of someone pursuing him for his slanderous rantings. His cup positively overflows.
But he is not totally alone. He always has constant companion and close friend Elva (wife of Daniel Gallagher) but he also has a few "birds of a feather" around him.
People, some of whom are almost illiterate (as evidenced by their writings on his guestbook), and people too who will jump on any bandwagon going to tear others apart ~ as long, of course, as they have the anonymity of the internet and a screen in front of them.
These people, his little band of followers, worship the ground he prances around on as he continues his quest for victory, old, saggy, wrinkly thing by his side (I refer here not to his close friend and constant companion Elva, but rather, his large satchel) over every person and every organisation that ever slighted him in any way. The fact that some of these slights may be figments of his florid imagination is neither here nor there to John Gill.
He is a little man with many big chips scattered between and on both shoulders and a little man who will not give up, driven as he is by his own demons, and cheered on by said band of followers. Some of whom are starting to wonder exactly what they got into when they first believed his diatribes.
But "a nasty, scruffy, horrible little bully"? Well, people can make up their own minds on whether that is a close despcription of him or not.
I tend to think of him as a sad, little man to whom both life and mother nature have dealt some hard blows and because of these he can no longer think, speak nor work with any semblence of rationality.
GIVE THEM ENOUGH ROPE ...
Give them enough rope, as the saying goes.
I haven't been on their cesspit sites for sometime but spent a while recently reading posts and I am glad I did spend a while there.
Now I have both Elva Gallagher and her close friend and companion, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) on open forum setting leaving themselves open to defamation action on many counts.
How strange, yet perfect, that these two very close friends, whilst basking in their own self importance and tied up in their mutual admiration, should be so blinded by the glow of their friendship that they completely lost the run of themselves and their fingers and forgot for a moment that there are other people in the world.
Others who might just have the intelligence to pick up their massive errors.
Yes, enough rope is now given.
I haven't been on their cesspit sites for sometime but spent a while recently reading posts and I am glad I did spend a while there.
Now I have both Elva Gallagher and her close friend and companion, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) on open forum setting leaving themselves open to defamation action on many counts.
How strange, yet perfect, that these two very close friends, whilst basking in their own self importance and tied up in their mutual admiration, should be so blinded by the glow of their friendship that they completely lost the run of themselves and their fingers and forgot for a moment that there are other people in the world.
Others who might just have the intelligence to pick up their massive errors.
Yes, enough rope is now given.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
WHO'S A NAUGHTY BOY?
My husband, that's who.
Unlike me, my husband is normally very even tempered and well mannered. However, recently he was a very naughty boy and I just LOVE him to bits for being so naughty.
After years of ridiculous court appearances in relation to the flogging of a dead horse by Elva Gallagher, and her constant companion and close friend, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, and Dick Turpin), oh and her husband, the much jailed, Daniel, he finally got frustrated with their carry on and he flicked a V at Daniel (he's the husband, not the close companion and friend).
HURRAH! GO SEAN!
I would have done it long ago, but then I am not at all as nice as he.
So, what happened?
In Letterkenny court (High Court on Circuit) recently, and after the Judge had given his decision, Daniel Gallagher (the husband, not the close companion and friend) kept talking at Sean. Sean got annoyed at Daniel's ridiculous behaviour and his loss of the run of himself, and gave him the V.
This threw Daniel into a total tail-spin and he started spluttering and yelling at the Judge whilst pointing to Sean "HE MADE A RUDE GESTURE TO ME!!!". (Not half rude enough in my opion). It was straight from some comedy sketch.
Daniel, the man shocked by a rude gesture, who not more than a number of months ago came to our office with his wife and threatened physical violence, only leaving when the threat of the gardai being called was told to him.
The man too who has refused for the last five years to vacate lands to which he is clearly not entitled, despite several court orders.
And this man and his wife (Elva, the close companion and friend of John Gill) have the cheek to say my husband has no respect for the law?
My husband has every respect for the law but none whatsover for the likes of Daniel and Elva Gallagher who totally ignore it and abuse it.
Unlike me, my husband is normally very even tempered and well mannered. However, recently he was a very naughty boy and I just LOVE him to bits for being so naughty.
After years of ridiculous court appearances in relation to the flogging of a dead horse by Elva Gallagher, and her constant companion and close friend, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, and Dick Turpin), oh and her husband, the much jailed, Daniel, he finally got frustrated with their carry on and he flicked a V at Daniel (he's the husband, not the close companion and friend).
HURRAH! GO SEAN!
I would have done it long ago, but then I am not at all as nice as he.
So, what happened?
In Letterkenny court (High Court on Circuit) recently, and after the Judge had given his decision, Daniel Gallagher (the husband, not the close companion and friend) kept talking at Sean. Sean got annoyed at Daniel's ridiculous behaviour and his loss of the run of himself, and gave him the V.
This threw Daniel into a total tail-spin and he started spluttering and yelling at the Judge whilst pointing to Sean "HE MADE A RUDE GESTURE TO ME!!!". (Not half rude enough in my opion). It was straight from some comedy sketch.
Daniel, the man shocked by a rude gesture, who not more than a number of months ago came to our office with his wife and threatened physical violence, only leaving when the threat of the gardai being called was told to him.
The man too who has refused for the last five years to vacate lands to which he is clearly not entitled, despite several court orders.
And this man and his wife (Elva, the close companion and friend of John Gill) have the cheek to say my husband has no respect for the law?
My husband has every respect for the law but none whatsover for the likes of Daniel and Elva Gallagher who totally ignore it and abuse it.
A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS INDEED A DANGEROUS THING
... and a total lack of knowledge in the hands of the deluded, even more dangerous.
Elva Gallagher, close friend of John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) and the “legal representative” of Daniel Gallagher as she calls herself should really not be listened to by anyone seeking any kind of legal advice. Yes, there is the matter of the legal advice dispensed from a trailer in their garden ~ in cash, tax free like John Gill ~ but even with an “office” this woman knows zilch about the law.
Why? Well, apart from the fact that her lack of legal knowledge has landed her husband in jail a number of times, and apart from the fact that her lack of legal knowledge has clocked up and continues to clock up one massive amount of money in costs, court fines, etc. on her husband, one of the things John Gill’s close friend, Elva, is very fond of doing is delivering self penned summonses. And even something as simple of that manages to make a pig’s ear of.
I was sitting in our car recently, in our own private parking area outside our house, waiting for Sean to come to the car as we were going out when all of a sudden the driver’s door opened and two envelopes were thrown into the car by a small, dark haired (heavily dyed dark hair I might add) woman in an old raincoat coat with the words “I am serving these summonses on you”. I was rather taken aback and as this is the first time I have ever seen her I didn't recognise her but the word "summons" let me know who she was.
So, apart from having the cheek to trespass on our property, with who I assumed to be her husband sitting revving their car our gate presumably for a hasty get-away, she once again proved her total inability to understand even the basics of law.
So, Elva, close friend of John Gill, for your future information when serving summons (because sadly I feel all too sure that her obsession with us will continue despite her futile quest to prove herself right in her persistent battle to get her hands on the land of the late Madge Friel, and no matter how many times her husband lands in jail because of her, she will continue) here’s what you did wrong.
ORDER 9 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT RULES requires PERSONAL service on each defendant which requires that each defendant be handed a true copy of the summons personally AND each defendant MUST be shown the original summons with the original stamp of the High Court.
Therefore the service is ineffective.
So, Elva, close friend of John Gill, sort it out you silly woman!
Elva Gallagher, close friend of John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) and the “legal representative” of Daniel Gallagher as she calls herself should really not be listened to by anyone seeking any kind of legal advice. Yes, there is the matter of the legal advice dispensed from a trailer in their garden ~ in cash, tax free like John Gill ~ but even with an “office” this woman knows zilch about the law.
Why? Well, apart from the fact that her lack of legal knowledge has landed her husband in jail a number of times, and apart from the fact that her lack of legal knowledge has clocked up and continues to clock up one massive amount of money in costs, court fines, etc. on her husband, one of the things John Gill’s close friend, Elva, is very fond of doing is delivering self penned summonses. And even something as simple of that manages to make a pig’s ear of.
I was sitting in our car recently, in our own private parking area outside our house, waiting for Sean to come to the car as we were going out when all of a sudden the driver’s door opened and two envelopes were thrown into the car by a small, dark haired (heavily dyed dark hair I might add) woman in an old raincoat coat with the words “I am serving these summonses on you”. I was rather taken aback and as this is the first time I have ever seen her I didn't recognise her but the word "summons" let me know who she was.
So, apart from having the cheek to trespass on our property, with who I assumed to be her husband sitting revving their car our gate presumably for a hasty get-away, she once again proved her total inability to understand even the basics of law.
So, Elva, close friend of John Gill, for your future information when serving summons (because sadly I feel all too sure that her obsession with us will continue despite her futile quest to prove herself right in her persistent battle to get her hands on the land of the late Madge Friel, and no matter how many times her husband lands in jail because of her, she will continue) here’s what you did wrong.
ORDER 9 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT RULES requires PERSONAL service on each defendant which requires that each defendant be handed a true copy of the summons personally AND each defendant MUST be shown the original summons with the original stamp of the High Court.
Therefore the service is ineffective.
So, Elva, close friend of John Gill, sort it out you silly woman!
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
THE LONE RANGER OR DICK TURPIN?
It seems St. John, The Lone Ranger may not be as saintly as his adoring fans ( for adoring fans read John Gill himself and his companion, Elva Gallagher) tell people via their two sites (victims of the legal profession exposed/crooked lawyers and rate your solicitor ~ which are one and the same. From the Irish Independent of the 10th November 2005:
"A group calling itself Victims of the Legal Profession Society (VLPS) has purchased the domain name rate your solicitor .com"
But because of recent information received, I am seriously considering changing his name from The Lone Ranger to Dick Turpin.
Why?
This registered bankrupt is charging a hefty fee for his "wisdom". In cash.
The fee John Gill is charging is €250 per hour!
Yes, you read that correctly. TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY CASH AN HOUR.
Not bad for a man who has not an iota on matters legal. (Remember how many people he has advised, which advice when taken has earned them visits to our jails?).
Back to the fee Dick Turpin, St. John, The Lone Ranger is charging.
If he "worked" a standard 39 hour week this would yield him a massive €9,750 a week.
NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOR 39 HOURS WORK.
In cash. Tax free.
Which for a month of our 5 day weeks would be €39,000.
Which would yield an annual income of €468,000 ~ nearly HALF A MILLION EURO!
But for the sake of fairness, let's say he only works half a week ~ nineteen and a half hours.
In a half week he would earn €4,875.
In a month that would be €19,500.
And the annual income, working only half a week for each week of the year, would earn him €234,000. CASH. TAX FREE.
If John Gill "worked" for one year (earning at €250 an hour for a 39 hour week, €468,000) he would be earning €268,000 more than the Taoiseach, Enda Kenny. And, unlike John Gill/Dick Turpin, Enda Kenny will be heavily taxed on his earnings.
Nice work if you can get it.
Caveat emptor.
"A group calling itself Victims of the Legal Profession Society (VLPS) has purchased the domain name rate your solicitor .com"
But because of recent information received, I am seriously considering changing his name from The Lone Ranger to Dick Turpin.
Why?
This registered bankrupt is charging a hefty fee for his "wisdom". In cash.
The fee John Gill is charging is €250 per hour!
Yes, you read that correctly. TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY CASH AN HOUR.
Not bad for a man who has not an iota on matters legal. (Remember how many people he has advised, which advice when taken has earned them visits to our jails?).
Back to the fee Dick Turpin, St. John, The Lone Ranger is charging.
If he "worked" a standard 39 hour week this would yield him a massive €9,750 a week.
NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOR 39 HOURS WORK.
In cash. Tax free.
Which for a month of our 5 day weeks would be €39,000.
Which would yield an annual income of €468,000 ~ nearly HALF A MILLION EURO!
But for the sake of fairness, let's say he only works half a week ~ nineteen and a half hours.
In a half week he would earn €4,875.
In a month that would be €19,500.
And the annual income, working only half a week for each week of the year, would earn him €234,000. CASH. TAX FREE.
If John Gill "worked" for one year (earning at €250 an hour for a 39 hour week, €468,000) he would be earning €268,000 more than the Taoiseach, Enda Kenny. And, unlike John Gill/Dick Turpin, Enda Kenny will be heavily taxed on his earnings.
Nice work if you can get it.
Caveat emptor.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
JUDGE JOHN O'HAGAN
From the Rate Your Solicitor site under the section about Judge O'Hagan:
"9th Oct 2009 Mrs. O'Connor
O'Hagan should stick to acting. The bench isn't the place for double standards or personalities. Let fairness and equality come to play before Sean McGlynn stains his robes forever. It suggests something is terribly wrong when a judge would bear the sins of a solicitor. What must he be afraid of, what does Mr. McGlynn have on the judge, it must be big."
Drama and intrigue! "stains his robes". "bear the sins of a solicitor". Shakespear must be turning in his grave!
But seriously, given the fact that another judge, Judge Edwards of the High Court, has upheld the decision of Judge John O'Hagan, and that another judge of the High Court held against Daniel and Elva Gallagher AGAINST Sean and Catherine McGlynn, is it even remotely possible that Mr. McGlynn as suggested has something on every single judge in Ireland?
This alone shows how ludicrous their entire site actually is.
"9th Oct 2009 Mrs. O'Connor
O'Hagan should stick to acting. The bench isn't the place for double standards or personalities. Let fairness and equality come to play before Sean McGlynn stains his robes forever. It suggests something is terribly wrong when a judge would bear the sins of a solicitor. What must he be afraid of, what does Mr. McGlynn have on the judge, it must be big."
Drama and intrigue! "stains his robes". "bear the sins of a solicitor". Shakespear must be turning in his grave!
But seriously, given the fact that another judge, Judge Edwards of the High Court, has upheld the decision of Judge John O'Hagan, and that another judge of the High Court held against Daniel and Elva Gallagher AGAINST Sean and Catherine McGlynn, is it even remotely possible that Mr. McGlynn as suggested has something on every single judge in Ireland?
This alone shows how ludicrous their entire site actually is.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
SANCTIMONIOUS OLD CURMUDGEONS
I was googling 'the Bog Hotel' the other day prior to our intended visit to it and came across this by "Joe Ferris" which is more than likely just another nom de plume of St. John, The Lone Ranger:
"Would VLPS members, perhaps agree that ‘Patsy Brogan’s 60sq m garden-shed bar in a bog in the Bluestack Mountains in Donegal’ would appear to be ‘Defacto A Bar’ and equivalent to ‘if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it’s a duck’?
Are VLPS members, perhaps puzzled as to the contradiction ‘Mr. Brogan said they might marry in Donegal, instead of Poland, because a hotelier told him he can have it for free’ and not in the ‘Bog Hotel’ ‘Patsy Brogan’s 60sq m garden-shed bar in a bog in the Bluestack Mountains in Donegal’?
PS Given the requirements as stated below:-
(they then go on to print parts of the Intoxicating Liquor Act).
Are VLPS members sceptical that the ‘Bog Hotel’ is completely free and Mr. Brogan is the Donegal Santa Claus and is not in breach of ‘7.—(1) From and after the passing of this Act no person shall sell, expose for sale, or keep for sale, by retail, any intoxicating liquor without being duly licensed so to sell the same, or at any place where he is not authorised by his licence to sell the same.’?
Are VLPS members also asking, “Where is the money coming from that Mr. Brogan can provide alcohol free to the public in his ‘Bog Hotel’’?
Would VLPS members, further agree that whilst RTE has Podge and Rodge in Donegal we have ‘Paudge and Friends’ ‘tangled web of deceit’ in the Administration of Law and Justice, in keeping with the quotation below? J.F.
O what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive.
—Sir Walter Scott, 1808
Did you ever read such a heap of sanctimonious drivel? What is wrong with these old curmudgeons, sitting on their tinfoil thrones trying to tear others apart? They don't appear to have one pleasant thought in their vacuous heads. Where do they get off tearing people they don't even know apart? What business is it of theirs what Patsy Brogan does or does not do? He won the case fairly and squarely. Mind you, the fact he used an actual solicitor probably doesn't sit well with them.
Perhaps they should get out more, live a little, speak to people who have a life and have happy thoughts. Maybe even take a trip to the Bog Hotel themselves. The difference between them and the lovely visitors I was chatting to on our visit to the bog hotel, all laughing and having fun, is so huge it is sad.
And another thing, WHAT is with all the legalese used? Are they all, perchance, wannabe lawyers atheart swinging brick?
Finally, I laughed at the choice of quote used by this bunch of blatant liars and scandalmongers. Oh, the irony.
(If you want to read my blog post on our visit to the Bog Hotel, click HERE.)
"Would VLPS members, perhaps agree that ‘Patsy Brogan’s 60sq m garden-shed bar in a bog in the Bluestack Mountains in Donegal’ would appear to be ‘Defacto A Bar’ and equivalent to ‘if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it’s a duck’?
Are VLPS members, perhaps puzzled as to the contradiction ‘Mr. Brogan said they might marry in Donegal, instead of Poland, because a hotelier told him he can have it for free’ and not in the ‘Bog Hotel’ ‘Patsy Brogan’s 60sq m garden-shed bar in a bog in the Bluestack Mountains in Donegal’?
PS Given the requirements as stated below:-
(they then go on to print parts of the Intoxicating Liquor Act).
Are VLPS members sceptical that the ‘Bog Hotel’ is completely free and Mr. Brogan is the Donegal Santa Claus and is not in breach of ‘7.—(1) From and after the passing of this Act no person shall sell, expose for sale, or keep for sale, by retail, any intoxicating liquor without being duly licensed so to sell the same, or at any place where he is not authorised by his licence to sell the same.’?
Are VLPS members also asking, “Where is the money coming from that Mr. Brogan can provide alcohol free to the public in his ‘Bog Hotel’’?
Would VLPS members, further agree that whilst RTE has Podge and Rodge in Donegal we have ‘Paudge and Friends’ ‘tangled web of deceit’ in the Administration of Law and Justice, in keeping with the quotation below? J.F.
O what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive.
—Sir Walter Scott, 1808
Did you ever read such a heap of sanctimonious drivel? What is wrong with these old curmudgeons, sitting on their tinfoil thrones trying to tear others apart? They don't appear to have one pleasant thought in their vacuous heads. Where do they get off tearing people they don't even know apart? What business is it of theirs what Patsy Brogan does or does not do? He won the case fairly and squarely. Mind you, the fact he used an actual solicitor probably doesn't sit well with them.
Perhaps they should get out more, live a little, speak to people who have a life and have happy thoughts. Maybe even take a trip to the Bog Hotel themselves. The difference between them and the lovely visitors I was chatting to on our visit to the bog hotel, all laughing and having fun, is so huge it is sad.
And another thing, WHAT is with all the legalese used? Are they all, perchance, wannabe lawyers at
Finally, I laughed at the choice of quote used by this bunch of blatant liars and scandalmongers. Oh, the irony.
(If you want to read my blog post on our visit to the Bog Hotel, click HERE.)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
