On crooked lawyers and rate your solicitor, I notice that I (Catherine McGlynn) feature extensively. The posters (aka John Gill and his tiny band of decrepid sychophantic followers) feel the need to make the most ridiculous personal comments about me.
Surely if these people are supposed to be working for people who have genuine concerns or complaints about the legal profession they should be concentrating their efforts on trying to resolve those concerns and complaints rather concentrating their time on personal attacks? But a lot of us know that helping people is not their main concern, their main concern is to grind their own particular axe.
They post things about me such 'as her glistening dentures', something that actually made me smile. Why? The word 'glistening'. I have all my own teeth, not a denture in sight (or in mouth for that matter) and to think one of these people noticed I have glistening teeth is very nice. Thank you.
They also say things like 'in her mid to late 50's'. What can I say ~ they should have gone to Specsavers.
Oh, and the ones that make me laugh most of all? Comments about my ability as a photographer. First, I am of course not a professional photographer ~ it is my passion. Someone (John, his companion, or one of their sychophants) said 'blurry' photos. I have discarded more excellent photos as not been good enough than any of The Lone Ranger's Little Folk will ever manage to take in their combined lifetimes. They even said the credits people have posted about my photos were posted by me under various names. My photos on flickr have been viewed by (currently) 19,407 people and commented on by many of those. In reality who on earth (or at least who with a modicom of intelligence) could imagine even I could manage all that! Oh, and let me show my selection of Donegal photos just to show they are fairly good http://www.flickr.com/photos/donegalireland/sets/
Ut est verum.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
THE LONE RANGER HAS BEEN CANONISED!
I took a little visit to the crooked laywers site recently and I can honestly say I haven't laughed so much in a long time.
It turns out that 'The Lone Ranger' has been canonised. I kid you not, posters on their guest book refer to him as 'St. John' and give him acolades such as "If John can't get it done, no-one can". Well, clearly no-one can get whatever "it" is done, since The Lone Ranger is a bit of a disaster himself ~ a registered bankrupt and a jailbird, having spent time behind bars recently as a guest of the State.
The site is bursting with a) John Gill posting under various names; b) his little handful of faithful followers posting under various names; and c) a combination of a and b here posting sychophantic slurry, tickling the feathers of their hero ~ St. John, The Lone Ranger of County Clare. (And don't forget folks, this bankrupt wants YOUR money "so any donations will be very welcome indeed. Please send to Mr John Gill, Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co. Clare.").
It turns out that 'The Lone Ranger' has been canonised. I kid you not, posters on their guest book refer to him as 'St. John' and give him acolades such as "If John can't get it done, no-one can". Well, clearly no-one can get whatever "it" is done, since The Lone Ranger is a bit of a disaster himself ~ a registered bankrupt and a jailbird, having spent time behind bars recently as a guest of the State.
The site is bursting with a) John Gill posting under various names; b) his little handful of faithful followers posting under various names; and c) a combination of a and b here posting sychophantic slurry, tickling the feathers of their hero ~ St. John, The Lone Ranger of County Clare. (And don't forget folks, this bankrupt wants YOUR money "so any donations will be very welcome indeed. Please send to Mr John Gill, Drumline, Newmarket-on-Fergus, Co. Clare.").
Monday, February 22, 2010
WOULD YOU LET YOUR ELDERLY HUSBAND GO TO JAIL?
22nd February 2010
Think about it. Would you want an elderly relative to go to jail? Would you stand back and see your elderly husband go to jail? Would you stand back and allow your grandfather or father to go to jail? I think not.
But today in Carrick on Shannon Elva Gallagher let her elderly husband go to jail. AGAIN. And for the THIRD time. And why? Well to futher her inflated self importance.
Although Elva and her pensioner supporters arrived on time, her elderly (and according to them, sickly) husband was not there. No, she knew he had to be there by order of the Court in Letterkenny last week but rather than travelling together she chose to engage the services and expense of the State yet again to bring Daniel to Court. But then SHE wasn't expecting to go to jail.
Daniel did arrive eventually, having been escorted by the Gardai from his home in Donegal and guess what? he was committed to prison for two weeks. I'm sure his wife wasn't surprised. She never has been.
It was notable today that the self appointed 'Lone Ranger' (for those who don't know, that is John Gill who swore an Affidavit saying he believed he was the Lone Ranger) was not present today as he was indisposed. No, not Swine flu, rather he chose the wrong words or attitude in the High Court in Dublin last week as a result of which he was found himself in contempt of court (what's new?) and was sent to jail.
So today Elva walks around like the old queen bee amongst her followers whilst her elderly huband is taken away to jail and her very best and closest friend John Gill too is in jail. Femme fatal or what?
So who do you feel sorry for?
Think about it. Would you want an elderly relative to go to jail? Would you stand back and see your elderly husband go to jail? Would you stand back and allow your grandfather or father to go to jail? I think not.
But today in Carrick on Shannon Elva Gallagher let her elderly husband go to jail. AGAIN. And for the THIRD time. And why? Well to futher her inflated self importance.
Although Elva and her pensioner supporters arrived on time, her elderly (and according to them, sickly) husband was not there. No, she knew he had to be there by order of the Court in Letterkenny last week but rather than travelling together she chose to engage the services and expense of the State yet again to bring Daniel to Court. But then SHE wasn't expecting to go to jail.
Daniel did arrive eventually, having been escorted by the Gardai from his home in Donegal and guess what? he was committed to prison for two weeks. I'm sure his wife wasn't surprised. She never has been.
It was notable today that the self appointed 'Lone Ranger' (for those who don't know, that is John Gill who swore an Affidavit saying he believed he was the Lone Ranger) was not present today as he was indisposed. No, not Swine flu, rather he chose the wrong words or attitude in the High Court in Dublin last week as a result of which he was found himself in contempt of court (what's new?) and was sent to jail.
So today Elva walks around like the old queen bee amongst her followers whilst her elderly huband is taken away to jail and her very best and closest friend John Gill too is in jail. Femme fatal or what?
So who do you feel sorry for?
Sunday, November 23, 2008
THE HALL OF SHAME
rateyoursolicitor.com and their sister site crookedlawyers.com came up with the idea of a Hall of Shame. Clearly the idea was for them to use it as a batton to beat anyone who crossed them.
Basically The Hall of Shame lists:
- Solicitors
- Barristers
- Judges
- And ANYONE else who John Gill of the VLPS and his friends decide to deride and award with an AVOID rating ~ repeatedly. And under various names.
It is a great place for these obsessed people to vent their spleen. And oh boy do they do vent with a vengence! Truth and facts are immaterial, all that is need is an axe to grind, actively encouraged by rateyoursolicitor.com.
Indeed the front page of rateyoursolicitor.com (25th of November 2008) says:
"A rating should be based on your own experience, or that of your company.There are four possible ratings:: Poor: Average: Good
Here are some guidelines to help you decide if an AVOID rating is justified:
* Did your solicitor wrongfully hold onto your files or papers?
* Did your solicitor wrongfully misappropriate money or property belonging to you?
* Is your solicitor untruthful and guilty of dishonest and dishonourable conduct?
* Do you believe that your solicitor does not carry on his/her practice in a professional and competent manner?
* Has your solicitor altered, distorted or suppressed legal documents?
* Did your solicitor commit or attempt to commit fraud or probate a fraudulent Will?
* Did your solicitor commit or attempt to commit an act which would attract a prison sentence if perpetrated by a lay person?"
They obviously prefer to encourage negativity and AVOID ratings.
Now let's take our (Sean McGlynn & Co.) entry into the Hall of Shame to prove the way they work.
First, a posting by John Gill, trumpeting about our being in their Hall of Shame, dated the 15th of November 2008:
"I see those lowest of lowlife trying to defend their conspiracy to defraud, perjury, theft of property, abuse of the system, low moral and ethical standards. How can these Liars and Thieves sleep at night? How low can a human being crawl? What kind of upbringing did they have, have they any sense of shame or decency at all? When are they going to wake up to the fact that they are in the Hall of Shame, do they not realise that the whole world is watching and waiting for the demise of the last bastion of the Black-n-Tans, the lowest of low life."
Of course, true to form, John Gill slips in and out of rateyoursolicitor.com (as he does on their sister site, crookedlawyers.com) to change his posts at will, as evidenced here with the above post originally reading:
"I see those lowest of lowlife trying to defend their conspiracy to defraud, perjury, theft of property, abuse of the system, low moral and ethical standards. How can these Liars and Thieves sleep at night? How low can a human being crawl? What kind of upbringing did they have? Did they not have enough to eat. Have they any sense of shame or decency at all? When are they going to wake up to the fact that they are in the scumbag Hall of Shame, do they not realise that the whole world is watching and waiting for the demise of the last bastion of the Black-n-Tans, the lowest of low life."
Strange, is it not, the way a man, John Gill, PRO of the VLPS, who claims to have no influence with rateyoursolicitor.com has carte blanche to change posts on rateyoursolicitor.com at will?
Now to our AVOID LISTINGS
The listings on Sean McGlynn & Co., Letterkenny, County Donegal, has 187 postings (it runs to 32 pages of hard copy).
The AVOID postings (which these people actively encourage) total 154
- AVOID postings by various 'branches' of the VLPS = 38
- AVOID postings by John Gill, using his own name = 24
- AVOID postings by Daniel Gallagher = 2
- AVOID postings are by people who claim to have been clients = 8
NOT ONE of these HAVE EVER BEEN clients of Sean McGlynn & Co.
- And the balance of the AVOID postings are made up of people posting under such names as
'AIB corner, Ploughing Championships' (7th October 2007) who said:
"Tis a long way from Killarney to Dublin Four Courts, you will have our support on the 8th of Oct, God willing. Tis past time someone took a stand against our new Black n Tans, the Cromwellian forces of the new century, fair play to you."
Does that post remind us of the posts of John Gill who constantly brings up the Black and Tans, no doubt a rather puerile and very unsubtle dig at their idea that I am English and Sean is Irish. (See John Gill's post above dated 15th of November 2008).
So, 100% ~ ONE HUNDRED PERCENT ~ of our AVOID postings are generated by the VLPS, John Gill, Daniel Gallagher, non-existent 'clients' and people not connected at all with the case and unknown to us.
What does that tell the readers of rateyoursolicitor.com?
Simply, it tells us that the whole thing is an absolute farce and riddled with lies.
AND FOR THE INFORMATION OF rateyoursolicitor.com ~ Try to at least get SOME of your basic facts right (the lies we have come to expect):
1. I am not English. Posters under various names keep repeating this non-fact as if it were an insult to me. Is being English a bad thing? Because you are clearly throwing this at me as if you think it is an insult to be English. And in so doing you insult all English people. Racism? I think so. Not exactly good PR. But then they do have John Gill as their PRO.
2. Brendan McGlynn, Auctioneer, is not Sean McGlynn's brother.
All of the above proves that these people are not above lies in the postings ~ if indeed proof was needed. And if I have been able, with little effort, to prove it in our case then it has the knock on effect of indicating that others with many AVOID postings may, and indeed probably, have been subject to the same lies.
There are other posters who have drawn the same conclusions:
"Mrs McGlynn, I read your blog and it certainly casts things in a different light. I am sorry to say that for a while it seemed Mr Gill and his crew were fighting the good fight but not (sic) its clear to see that they are the ones who are up to no good."
Posted by George Kirk (who is totally unknown to us) 20th of November 2008
"Anyone interested in these allegations should read the recent High Court judgement on these matters. It is available on the Courts site. In my opinion it completely vindicates the McGlynns."
Posted by John Finnegan (who is unknown to us) 17th of January 2008
"You should all stop ranting and read the High Court judgement where all of these accusations were considered and found to be without any foundation. I am an independent reader who looked at this website out of interest, and has become totally disillusioned with the pointless nature of the baseless mudslinging that goes on."
Posted by John Finnegan (who is unknown to us) 10th of April 2008
I'd like to thank John Finnegan and George Kirk, neither of whom we know, for at least trying to bring some rationality to the site.
rateyoursolicitor is not the place for sane, rational people to associate themselves with, and nor is their sister site crookedlawyers.com. And all because John Gill and his friends, through their total lack of intelligence and decency, have ruined their own sites.
NB. From the front page of rateyoursolicitor.com
"THIS WEBSITE IS HOSTED IN THE USA AND IS GOVERNED BY U.S. LAW ONLY!"
If rateyoursolicitor.com and crookedlawyers.com were set up with good intentions, why then are they both now, and always have been since inception, registered with a host site outside of Ireland? Think about it.
~~~~~
NOTE: I have posted all above on rateyoursolicitor.com tonight 25th November 2008. Will they post it? I think they will.
THREE DAYS LATER:
I was wrong. They have been posting things I posted on their sites since I opened this blog on the 11th of November 2008, and only because I informed John Gill by email about this blog. So they are aware of it and as indicated by postings on their sites since. are reading my blog.
But clearly, as proven by my exposing their lies here, they do not want the proof I exposed to appear on the rateyoursolicitor.com Hall of Shame.
Because if this proof of their lies did it would knock all the other threads on rateyoursolicitor (and indeed the waffle on their siter site crookedlawyers.com) into a cocked hat.
So exposing their lies on the Sean McGlynn & Co. thread on rateyoursolicitor.com to be an absolute farce and riddled with lies exposes at the VERY least the possibility that the rest of rateyoursolicitor.com is too a farce.
YOU REALLY CAN'T IMPROVE ON THE TRUTH.
Basically The Hall of Shame lists:
- Solicitors
- Barristers
- Judges
- And ANYONE else who John Gill of the VLPS and his friends decide to deride and award with an AVOID rating ~ repeatedly. And under various names.
It is a great place for these obsessed people to vent their spleen. And oh boy do they do vent with a vengence! Truth and facts are immaterial, all that is need is an axe to grind, actively encouraged by rateyoursolicitor.com.
Indeed the front page of rateyoursolicitor.com (25th of November 2008) says:
"A rating should be based on your own experience, or that of your company.There are four possible ratings:: Poor: Average: Good
Here are some guidelines to help you decide if an AVOID rating is justified:
* Did your solicitor wrongfully hold onto your files or papers?
* Did your solicitor wrongfully misappropriate money or property belonging to you?
* Is your solicitor untruthful and guilty of dishonest and dishonourable conduct?
* Do you believe that your solicitor does not carry on his/her practice in a professional and competent manner?
* Has your solicitor altered, distorted or suppressed legal documents?
* Did your solicitor commit or attempt to commit fraud or probate a fraudulent Will?
* Did your solicitor commit or attempt to commit an act which would attract a prison sentence if perpetrated by a lay person?"
They obviously prefer to encourage negativity and AVOID ratings.
Now let's take our (Sean McGlynn & Co.) entry into the Hall of Shame to prove the way they work.
First, a posting by John Gill, trumpeting about our being in their Hall of Shame, dated the 15th of November 2008:
"I see those lowest of lowlife trying to defend their conspiracy to defraud, perjury, theft of property, abuse of the system, low moral and ethical standards. How can these Liars and Thieves sleep at night? How low can a human being crawl? What kind of upbringing did they have, have they any sense of shame or decency at all? When are they going to wake up to the fact that they are in the Hall of Shame, do they not realise that the whole world is watching and waiting for the demise of the last bastion of the Black-n-Tans, the lowest of low life."
Of course, true to form, John Gill slips in and out of rateyoursolicitor.com (as he does on their sister site, crookedlawyers.com) to change his posts at will, as evidenced here with the above post originally reading:
"I see those lowest of lowlife trying to defend their conspiracy to defraud, perjury, theft of property, abuse of the system, low moral and ethical standards. How can these Liars and Thieves sleep at night? How low can a human being crawl? What kind of upbringing did they have? Did they not have enough to eat. Have they any sense of shame or decency at all? When are they going to wake up to the fact that they are in the scumbag Hall of Shame, do they not realise that the whole world is watching and waiting for the demise of the last bastion of the Black-n-Tans, the lowest of low life."
Strange, is it not, the way a man, John Gill, PRO of the VLPS, who claims to have no influence with rateyoursolicitor.com has carte blanche to change posts on rateyoursolicitor.com at will?
Now to our AVOID LISTINGS
The listings on Sean McGlynn & Co., Letterkenny, County Donegal, has 187 postings (it runs to 32 pages of hard copy).
The AVOID postings (which these people actively encourage) total 154
- AVOID postings by various 'branches' of the VLPS = 38
- AVOID postings by John Gill, using his own name = 24
- AVOID postings by Daniel Gallagher = 2
- AVOID postings are by people who claim to have been clients = 8
NOT ONE of these HAVE EVER BEEN clients of Sean McGlynn & Co.
- And the balance of the AVOID postings are made up of people posting under such names as
'AIB corner, Ploughing Championships' (7th October 2007) who said:
"Tis a long way from Killarney to Dublin Four Courts, you will have our support on the 8th of Oct, God willing. Tis past time someone took a stand against our new Black n Tans, the Cromwellian forces of the new century, fair play to you."
Does that post remind us of the posts of John Gill who constantly brings up the Black and Tans, no doubt a rather puerile and very unsubtle dig at their idea that I am English and Sean is Irish. (See John Gill's post above dated 15th of November 2008).
So, 100% ~ ONE HUNDRED PERCENT ~ of our AVOID postings are generated by the VLPS, John Gill, Daniel Gallagher, non-existent 'clients' and people not connected at all with the case and unknown to us.
What does that tell the readers of rateyoursolicitor.com?
Simply, it tells us that the whole thing is an absolute farce and riddled with lies.
AND FOR THE INFORMATION OF rateyoursolicitor.com ~ Try to at least get SOME of your basic facts right (the lies we have come to expect):
1. I am not English. Posters under various names keep repeating this non-fact as if it were an insult to me. Is being English a bad thing? Because you are clearly throwing this at me as if you think it is an insult to be English. And in so doing you insult all English people. Racism? I think so. Not exactly good PR. But then they do have John Gill as their PRO.
2. Brendan McGlynn, Auctioneer, is not Sean McGlynn's brother.
All of the above proves that these people are not above lies in the postings ~ if indeed proof was needed. And if I have been able, with little effort, to prove it in our case then it has the knock on effect of indicating that others with many AVOID postings may, and indeed probably, have been subject to the same lies.
There are other posters who have drawn the same conclusions:
"Mrs McGlynn, I read your blog and it certainly casts things in a different light. I am sorry to say that for a while it seemed Mr Gill and his crew were fighting the good fight but not (sic) its clear to see that they are the ones who are up to no good."
Posted by George Kirk (who is totally unknown to us) 20th of November 2008
"Anyone interested in these allegations should read the recent High Court judgement on these matters. It is available on the Courts site. In my opinion it completely vindicates the McGlynns."
Posted by John Finnegan (who is unknown to us) 17th of January 2008
"You should all stop ranting and read the High Court judgement where all of these accusations were considered and found to be without any foundation. I am an independent reader who looked at this website out of interest, and has become totally disillusioned with the pointless nature of the baseless mudslinging that goes on."
Posted by John Finnegan (who is unknown to us) 10th of April 2008
I'd like to thank John Finnegan and George Kirk, neither of whom we know, for at least trying to bring some rationality to the site.
rateyoursolicitor is not the place for sane, rational people to associate themselves with, and nor is their sister site crookedlawyers.com. And all because John Gill and his friends, through their total lack of intelligence and decency, have ruined their own sites.
NB. From the front page of rateyoursolicitor.com
"THIS WEBSITE IS HOSTED IN THE USA AND IS GOVERNED BY U.S. LAW ONLY!"
If rateyoursolicitor.com and crookedlawyers.com were set up with good intentions, why then are they both now, and always have been since inception, registered with a host site outside of Ireland? Think about it.
~~~~~
NOTE: I have posted all above on rateyoursolicitor.com tonight 25th November 2008. Will they post it? I think they will.
THREE DAYS LATER:
I was wrong. They have been posting things I posted on their sites since I opened this blog on the 11th of November 2008, and only because I informed John Gill by email about this blog. So they are aware of it and as indicated by postings on their sites since. are reading my blog.
But clearly, as proven by my exposing their lies here, they do not want the proof I exposed to appear on the rateyoursolicitor.com Hall of Shame.
Because if this proof of their lies did it would knock all the other threads on rateyoursolicitor (and indeed the waffle on their siter site crookedlawyers.com) into a cocked hat.
So exposing their lies on the Sean McGlynn & Co. thread on rateyoursolicitor.com to be an absolute farce and riddled with lies exposes at the VERY least the possibility that the rest of rateyoursolicitor.com is too a farce.
YOU REALLY CAN'T IMPROVE ON THE TRUTH.
Friday, November 21, 2008
WHO IS THE ABSOLUTE LUNATIC?
Since I posted here the thread: RATEYOURSOLICTOR/CROOKEDLAWYERS (link:
http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-why-this-site-is.html ), one of the postings on the crookedlawyers.com Guestbook by someone who calls himself Absolute Lunatic has mysteriously disappeared.
These 2 postings are still there:
"In India throwing Acid in someone (sic) face is perfectly acceptable means of figting (sic) crime. Ireland needs a similar method."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th September 2006 and is still there as of todays date (21st of of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Wakeupcall
Country:
Date: Sun Sep 10 03:29:44 2006
Comment: I don't blame Solicitors I blame all the cheats and scammers who thing having a large family is a good enough reason to take whatever they want to better themselves. Solicitors are dirty and take money under the table all the time its human nature for them to do that. Ireland's laws need to focus more on fraud than any other crime. In India throwing Acid in someone face is perfectly acceptable means of figting crime. Ireland needs a similar method
"In America if a Solicitor/Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th of July 2006 and is still there as of today's date (21st of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Good Night
Country: USA
Date: Mon Jul 10 00:21:39 2006
Comment: I am a American who family comes from Ireland. I guess that most Irish are very Peaceful people who blame themselves for problems caused by Solicitors. I read articles on victims of Solicitors who had there entire life savings as well as their homes taken by Solicitors. I find it strange that these victims are committing Suicide so soon. In America if a Solicitor/ Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide.
The post that has mysteriously disappeared:
"... the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 7th of September 2006, was still when I posted it here on the 12th of November 2008, and now it has gone.
The full post:
Name: Absolute Lunatic
Country: Rockall
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:19:16 2006
Comment: I would like to comment on Imelda (sic) asertion (sic) that this forum is for lazy malicious cowards. She is right the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats.
That post, unitl I posted it on this blog on the 12th of November 2008, had been on page 10 (currently) of the Guestbook and had been there for OVER 2 YEARS slotted in between these two posts that remain as of this date:
Name: Bernard
Country: Ireland
Date: Fri Sep 8 18:35:56 2006
Comment: Liam, have you ever tried to make a complaint against a solicitor through the so called 'legitimate channels'? Unfortunately consumers have no other option but to try 'ranting' on websites to encourage change. How many solicitors have been stopped from practicing by the law society due to misconduct? Answer: zero! How about the redress board scandal? How many solicitors have been punished for stealing from those victims? Answer: Zero. They got a slap on the wrist!
Name: Liam
Country: Ireland
Date: Thu Sep 7 18:31:00 2006
Comment: Bernard, I agree fully with Imelda. Nobody is denying that there are bad apples in the legal profession, but the malicious scattergun approach taken by the so called victims of the legal profession society is simply an extended rant, and it lacks all credibility. You can practically feel the sparks from the huge axe they are grinding. There are legitimate channels for ventilating complaints against members of the legal profession. Those with personal vendettas need not apply.
For the information of people reading, a poster on a Guestbook cannot remove his posting therefore the people/person ( link: http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-dot-com-tdi-mill.html ) who own/run the site are the only one/s who can remove it. Which begs the question: why would that one post be removed when other offensive posts remain?
http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-why-this-site-is.html ), one of the postings on the crookedlawyers.com Guestbook by someone who calls himself Absolute Lunatic has mysteriously disappeared.
These 2 postings are still there:
"In India throwing Acid in someone (sic) face is perfectly acceptable means of figting (sic) crime. Ireland needs a similar method."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th September 2006 and is still there as of todays date (21st of of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Wakeupcall
Country:
Date: Sun Sep 10 03:29:44 2006
Comment: I don't blame Solicitors I blame all the cheats and scammers who thing having a large family is a good enough reason to take whatever they want to better themselves. Solicitors are dirty and take money under the table all the time its human nature for them to do that. Ireland's laws need to focus more on fraud than any other crime. In India throwing Acid in someone face is perfectly acceptable means of figting crime. Ireland needs a similar method
"In America if a Solicitor/Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th of July 2006 and is still there as of today's date (21st of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Good Night
Country: USA
Date: Mon Jul 10 00:21:39 2006
Comment: I am a American who family comes from Ireland. I guess that most Irish are very Peaceful people who blame themselves for problems caused by Solicitors. I read articles on victims of Solicitors who had there entire life savings as well as their homes taken by Solicitors. I find it strange that these victims are committing Suicide so soon. In America if a Solicitor/ Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide.
The post that has mysteriously disappeared:
"... the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 7th of September 2006, was still when I posted it here on the 12th of November 2008, and now it has gone.
The full post:
Name: Absolute Lunatic
Country: Rockall
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:19:16 2006
Comment: I would like to comment on Imelda (sic) asertion (sic) that this forum is for lazy malicious cowards. She is right the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats.
That post, unitl I posted it on this blog on the 12th of November 2008, had been on page 10 (currently) of the Guestbook and had been there for OVER 2 YEARS slotted in between these two posts that remain as of this date:
Name: Bernard
Country: Ireland
Date: Fri Sep 8 18:35:56 2006
Comment: Liam, have you ever tried to make a complaint against a solicitor through the so called 'legitimate channels'? Unfortunately consumers have no other option but to try 'ranting' on websites to encourage change. How many solicitors have been stopped from practicing by the law society due to misconduct? Answer: zero! How about the redress board scandal? How many solicitors have been punished for stealing from those victims? Answer: Zero. They got a slap on the wrist!
Name: Liam
Country: Ireland
Date: Thu Sep 7 18:31:00 2006
Comment: Bernard, I agree fully with Imelda. Nobody is denying that there are bad apples in the legal profession, but the malicious scattergun approach taken by the so called victims of the legal profession society is simply an extended rant, and it lacks all credibility. You can practically feel the sparks from the huge axe they are grinding. There are legitimate channels for ventilating complaints against members of the legal profession. Those with personal vendettas need not apply.
For the information of people reading, a poster on a Guestbook cannot remove his posting therefore the people/person ( link: http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-dot-com-tdi-mill.html ) who own/run the site are the only one/s who can remove it. Which begs the question: why would that one post be removed when other offensive posts remain?
So who is the 'Absolute Lunatic'?. And why did s/he have that post removed? Could it be that the owner/s of crookedlawyers.com might have to give up the identity of the 'Absolute Lunatic' if called upon to so do? And in so doing would the identity of the Absolute Lunatic totally embarass crookedlawyers.com and the VLPS? It certainly looks that way.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
THANK YOU
I wish to thank the many people who have contacted me with their support, assistance and information since opening this blog, and to let them know I will respond to all in due course.
Thank you.
Catherine McGlynn
Thank you.
Catherine McGlynn
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
THE ANCESTRAL HOME
19th November 2008
Our Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Brian Cowan has invited the 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, to visit his ancestral home in County Offaly, Ireland.
I really hope that Mr. Obama does not run into John Gill and the members of the Victims of the Legal Profession (VLPS) whilst here. Imagine if they could persuade Mr. Obama to fight for the rights to his ancestral home?
Does that sound ridiculous? Of course it does!
Every bit as ridiculous as Daniel and Elva Gallagher claiming the land owned by the late Mrs. Madge Friel is their ancestral home. (Sean McGlynn and Catherine McGlynn -v- Daniel Gallagher and Charles Gallagher). At least Daniel Gallagher's brother, Charles Gallagher, recognises the fact that there is no claim and has from an early stage indicated this to Sean and Catherine McGlynn.
Further, Elva Gallagher has absolutely no connection whatsoever with the said property, and Daniel Gallagher was not born there. Nor was his father, Anton Gallagher, and nor indeed was Anton Gallagher's father. And how can he, Daniel Gallagher, or anybody, honestly believe that this man Daniel Gallagher can have a better entitlement to the land of Madge Friel (he has never disputed that the land belonged to Madge Friel) than her nephews and nieces, her nearest next of kin who are rightfully entitled to the lands and have a far closer connection to the lands than Daniel Gallagher or any of his family. Remember that Daniel Gallagher is the son of Anton Gallagher who was a first cousin of Madge Friel and that makes Daniel Gallagher a second cousin which in terms of next of kin is far removed from nephews and nieces.
The right to any ancestral home claimed by Daniel and Elva Gallagher is every bit as remote as any link Barack Obama may have with any ancestral home in County Offaly. The only difference being, Mr. Obama is intelligent enough to know that.
Our Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Brian Cowan has invited the 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, to visit his ancestral home in County Offaly, Ireland.
I really hope that Mr. Obama does not run into John Gill and the members of the Victims of the Legal Profession (VLPS) whilst here. Imagine if they could persuade Mr. Obama to fight for the rights to his ancestral home?
Does that sound ridiculous? Of course it does!
Every bit as ridiculous as Daniel and Elva Gallagher claiming the land owned by the late Mrs. Madge Friel is their ancestral home. (Sean McGlynn and Catherine McGlynn -v- Daniel Gallagher and Charles Gallagher). At least Daniel Gallagher's brother, Charles Gallagher, recognises the fact that there is no claim and has from an early stage indicated this to Sean and Catherine McGlynn.
Further, Elva Gallagher has absolutely no connection whatsoever with the said property, and Daniel Gallagher was not born there. Nor was his father, Anton Gallagher, and nor indeed was Anton Gallagher's father. And how can he, Daniel Gallagher, or anybody, honestly believe that this man Daniel Gallagher can have a better entitlement to the land of Madge Friel (he has never disputed that the land belonged to Madge Friel) than her nephews and nieces, her nearest next of kin who are rightfully entitled to the lands and have a far closer connection to the lands than Daniel Gallagher or any of his family. Remember that Daniel Gallagher is the son of Anton Gallagher who was a first cousin of Madge Friel and that makes Daniel Gallagher a second cousin which in terms of next of kin is far removed from nephews and nieces.
The right to any ancestral home claimed by Daniel and Elva Gallagher is every bit as remote as any link Barack Obama may have with any ancestral home in County Offaly. The only difference being, Mr. Obama is intelligent enough to know that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
