I will do it soon.
Monday, July 9, 2012
NAMING THE TEXTER
I suppose the time has come to reveal the identity of the insider who telephoned and texted me with information of the "Victims".
Monday, May 28, 2012
AND NOW WE LEARN WHO WAS POSTING
The great upshot of Damien Tansey winning his case against John Gill is that he has been given all data from the host of Rate Your Solicitor.com, dotster.com
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES UPDATED
Those who read this blog will be aware of my post about a member of "The Victims of the Legal Profession" contacting me by telephone and text numerous times. Yes, the person did spill a lot of the secrets of this ridiculous little band of people but the person then decided to get nasty.
Of course I reported this to the Gardai (Police) and it seems the pest is exactly the person I thought it was.
Now this person will have to think a little before they decide to abuse anyone by phone again.
I will reveal more at a later date.
In the meantime, anyone who did not see the initial post can catch up HERE.
Of course I reported this to the Gardai (Police) and it seems the pest is exactly the person I thought it was.
Now this person will have to think a little before they decide to abuse anyone by phone again.
I will reveal more at a later date.
In the meantime, anyone who did not see the initial post can catch up HERE.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
THESE PEOPLE ACTUALLY SUPPORT THREATINGING A BABY
After you read the following and what they are doing with my baby grandchild, scroll down to the end to see what they did on their guestbook when I tried to post. (Updates to this post can be seen at the end of it).
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
TANSEY -V- GILL: HIGH COURT ORDER
Further to my post here "DAMIEN TANSEY -V- JOHN GILL: IGNORING THE LAW" where I told how John Gill openly ignored the High Court Order imposed on him by Judge Michael Peart in the High Court, (a fact I only learned thanks to the texts I was receiving from one of their group who is not as loyal to them as they think ~ TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES explains this), the guestbook on the crookedlawyerss.com site openly gives links to the rateyoursolicitor.com site:
"access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost. com/ "
and:
"opps made a mistake Access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost.com/ "
I have removed the number code for posting here but the above two posts appear with the full link code to rateyoursolicitor.com on the crookedlawyers.com guestbook.
John Gill and his loyal (and some not so loyal) followers display, at the very least, an extremely cavalier attitude to the law in Ireland.
"access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost. com/ "
and:
"opps made a mistake Access to Rate-Your-Solicitor website http:// d10*****-*.dotsterhost.com/ "
I have removed the number code for posting here but the above two posts appear with the full link code to rateyoursolicitor.com on the crookedlawyers.com guestbook.
John Gill and his loyal (and some not so loyal) followers display, at the very least, an extremely cavalier attitude to the law in Ireland.
VLPS GUESTBOOK EXPOSED
I have long known and said that the VLPS/crookedlawyers.com guestbook entries are from a small core group using various names and NOT genuine posters. But what else would anyone expect when the postings on their rateyoursolcitor.com site were mainly by a small band of repeat posters using different names?
And now I have the undeniable proof.~ numerous posters there with the same IP.
Tomorrow I will post the proof.
It will take me hours to actually correlate all these bogus posters into one segment here. Hang in there.
They will be here tomorrow Sunday 12th of February 2012.
SUNDAY 12TH FEBRUARY 2012
Before you begin, I must warn you that this is a long read with a lot of detail so pour yourself a cuppa before you begin ...
The guestbook on crookedlawyers.com now displays a posters IP address (or the first three sets of digits of the IP address I should say).
This has been done for one of two reasons:
1. The VLPS themselves decided to do this.
2. The guestbook provider FORCED them do it.
Time will tell which of the two are correct.
But, if, after this blog post in which I will expose beyond any shadow of doubt their disingenuous ways, the IP identity of posters on their guestbook disappear or are no longer shown, then it is option 1 above. If it was their own doing, they created a spectacular own goal with that one.
However if they remain, we can only assume that it is option 2 above and their guestbook provider no longer trusts them and is, to say the very least, nervous of the way in which the VLPS conduct themselves on the internet and how they abuse the free guestbook on crookedlawyers.com. Perhaps my VLPS insider texter informed on them?
Now, back to the postings on the guestbook. I looked over the postings there between the dates of the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012 (the date I learned the guestbook was still online from my VLPS insider).
There are 379 posts between the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012.
Of them 21 are by John Gill (ironically 21 is the number of piano concerti by the great composer Mozart, and 21 posts from John Gill who can't even compose himself, even in his pink shirt and hipster flares).
107 are by Eugene Cafferky, (who seems to spend his time lecturing to no-one given that I suspect most readers of the guestbook, like me, just pass over his rantings).
118 are by the unlucky-in-love and prolific poster, Michael Bradshaw. (You will remember him as the man who canonised John Gill and adoringly called him St. John), although by the look of the guestbook in the past few days he seems to be all out of love for the "hero" he once openly adored). Posted by Michael Bradshaw 10/02/2012 "'Frankies nite Club' come and see Gill 'boppin' in his flared trousers and Ben Sherman shirt , he likes the pinky ones and watch those hipsters move. and dont buy his new book because if it's anything like the last one it must be appalling , did i tell you Gill had sidekick Carraher delivering boxes of his last worst seller to their legal friends in Bray , 'Hinge and Bracket' as they're known in Bray , Hinge and Bracket and no Door". The image of diminutive John Gill boppin' in his flared hipsters and pink shirt is an image many us will now think of when we hear of him. That and the Brillo-pad 'do.
13 are by Joe Ferris (who in his own words is "Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" (Derry) (imagine HIM teaching your kids?!) but whom I think rather fancies himself as a bit of a Rumpole of the Bailey if we look at his favourite turns of speech: "Would the VLPS agree that" and "Could it be argued" (does he prance around his bedroom in a wig and gown in front of a mirror?).
And finally, 6 postings by Sean Carraher who seems to have some sort of major gripe with the Gardai.
So they total 265 posts of the 379 posts we are discussing here. That leaves 114 posts not attributed to them.
First, the IP address. The first digits of any IP address indicates the ISP (internet service provider). If we take those for posters for example here, John Gill's IP address begins with 86 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is eircom. Michael Bradshaw's is 79 which in Ireland indicates that his ISP is Upc. Eugene Cafferky's is 92 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is Hutchinson 3g Ireland. Outside of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) these ISPs will be from other providers. For instance, Joe Ferris has two: one his home one and one his work or mobile. The ISPs in his case are Virgin Media and Talktalk UK. If the second one is not his mobile and is his work then I am not at all sure his bosses would like to know that he uses their computers and time to be doing his VLPS business.
My own IP starts with 93 (vodafone) and NOT the one (82) of the poster on their guestbook using my name and location (31st December 2011).
So that briefly explains about the first two digits of the IP address.
Now on the guestbook, as I said, we have 114 posts from the 1st of January 2012 to the 8th of February 2012 not attributed to the "famous five" (Gill, Cafferky, Bradshaw, Ferris,and Carraher).
Of that 114, 47, yes FORTY SEVEN "posters" have the one IP address. And of those 47, 29 are about me! What else woulld I expect?
That is over 41% of them (luckily I have a husband with a great brain for maths to save me reaching for a calculator to work that out!). Coincidentally my husband was taught maths by two people who are connected, one indirectly and the other very directly, to our case with the Gallaghers. His maths teachers were Fr. Carr, now Parish Priest in Daniel and Elva Gallagher's parish, and Fr. McMahon who inherited and received the gold watch that the Gallaghers wrongly and repeatedly accuse me of stealing ~ MADGE FRIEL'S GOLD WATCH). Small world and all that.
Back to the false poster. The IP of the (forty seven names) poster is 86.159.225. (the last section is not added). This one poster also shows many "locations" too. In alphabetical order, and including the posters "location" where given, but not including the times they posted twice under one of the names ("Holly", "Trina", "Lillian" "Tessa", "Moira" and "Trish"), here are the FORTY ONE names used by this poster:
If they can't be trusted to run a guestbook decently and honestly, which we know already from the vile abuse they allow be posted there they can't, but now proof positive that they make up user names to write prolifically on the guestbook, then how on earth could ANYONE trust anything they say or do?
It is just not possible.
And finally, on the subject of their guestbook, this, the first post on their then new guestbook on the 7th of November 2010 at 20:16:07:
"Name: VLPS Email: lawyercatcher @ lawyer.com Web: http:// www. crookedlawyers.com
Location: Ireland Number: 1
The guestbook company we were using has gone out of business so a new guestbook has been set up.
Unfortunately, messages posted after Sept 2006 are lost, unless someone else has saved them"
In reply to that I would say, firstly, what kind of absolute grade A plonkers run a site and have no copies saved?
Secondly and in reply to the post I would say to "lawyercatcher", I have!
Every single one going right back to the very beginning both in hard copy and on a computer especially dedicated and used only for the VLPS and the rateyoursolicitor group and all their writings. Feel free to email me to ask for them.
And now I have the undeniable proof.~ numerous posters there with the same IP.
Tomorrow I will post the proof.
It will take me hours to actually correlate all these bogus posters into one segment here. Hang in there.
They will be here tomorrow Sunday 12th of February 2012.
SUNDAY 12TH FEBRUARY 2012
Before you begin, I must warn you that this is a long read with a lot of detail so pour yourself a cuppa before you begin ...
The guestbook on crookedlawyers.com now displays a posters IP address (or the first three sets of digits of the IP address I should say).
This has been done for one of two reasons:
1. The VLPS themselves decided to do this.
2. The guestbook provider FORCED them do it.
Time will tell which of the two are correct.
But, if, after this blog post in which I will expose beyond any shadow of doubt their disingenuous ways, the IP identity of posters on their guestbook disappear or are no longer shown, then it is option 1 above. If it was their own doing, they created a spectacular own goal with that one.
However if they remain, we can only assume that it is option 2 above and their guestbook provider no longer trusts them and is, to say the very least, nervous of the way in which the VLPS conduct themselves on the internet and how they abuse the free guestbook on crookedlawyers.com. Perhaps my VLPS insider texter informed on them?
Now, back to the postings on the guestbook. I looked over the postings there between the dates of the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012 (the date I learned the guestbook was still online from my VLPS insider).
There are 379 posts between the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012.
Of them 21 are by John Gill (ironically 21 is the number of piano concerti by the great composer Mozart, and 21 posts from John Gill who can't even compose himself, even in his pink shirt and hipster flares).
107 are by Eugene Cafferky, (who seems to spend his time lecturing to no-one given that I suspect most readers of the guestbook, like me, just pass over his rantings).
118 are by the unlucky-in-love and prolific poster, Michael Bradshaw. (You will remember him as the man who canonised John Gill and adoringly called him St. John), although by the look of the guestbook in the past few days he seems to be all out of love for the "hero" he once openly adored). Posted by Michael Bradshaw 10/02/2012 "'Frankies nite Club' come and see Gill 'boppin' in his flared trousers and Ben Sherman shirt , he likes the pinky ones and watch those hipsters move. and dont buy his new book because if it's anything like the last one it must be appalling , did i tell you Gill had sidekick Carraher delivering boxes of his last worst seller to their legal friends in Bray , 'Hinge and Bracket' as they're known in Bray , Hinge and Bracket and no Door". The image of diminutive John Gill boppin' in his flared hipsters and pink shirt is an image many us will now think of when we hear of him. That and the Brillo-pad 'do.
13 are by Joe Ferris (who in his own words is "Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" (Derry) (imagine HIM teaching your kids?!) but whom I think rather fancies himself as a bit of a Rumpole of the Bailey if we look at his favourite turns of speech: "Would the VLPS agree that" and "Could it be argued" (does he prance around his bedroom in a wig and gown in front of a mirror?).
And finally, 6 postings by Sean Carraher who seems to have some sort of major gripe with the Gardai.
So they total 265 posts of the 379 posts we are discussing here. That leaves 114 posts not attributed to them.
First, the IP address. The first digits of any IP address indicates the ISP (internet service provider). If we take those for posters for example here, John Gill's IP address begins with 86 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is eircom. Michael Bradshaw's is 79 which in Ireland indicates that his ISP is Upc. Eugene Cafferky's is 92 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is Hutchinson 3g Ireland. Outside of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) these ISPs will be from other providers. For instance, Joe Ferris has two: one his home one and one his work or mobile. The ISPs in his case are Virgin Media and Talktalk UK. If the second one is not his mobile and is his work then I am not at all sure his bosses would like to know that he uses their computers and time to be doing his VLPS business.
My own IP starts with 93 (vodafone) and NOT the one (82) of the poster on their guestbook using my name and location (31st December 2011).
So that briefly explains about the first two digits of the IP address.
Now on the guestbook, as I said, we have 114 posts from the 1st of January 2012 to the 8th of February 2012 not attributed to the "famous five" (Gill, Cafferky, Bradshaw, Ferris,and Carraher).
Of that 114, 47, yes FORTY SEVEN "posters" have the one IP address. And of those 47, 29 are about me! What else woulld I expect?
That is over 41% of them (luckily I have a husband with a great brain for maths to save me reaching for a calculator to work that out!). Coincidentally my husband was taught maths by two people who are connected, one indirectly and the other very directly, to our case with the Gallaghers. His maths teachers were Fr. Carr, now Parish Priest in Daniel and Elva Gallagher's parish, and Fr. McMahon who inherited and received the gold watch that the Gallaghers wrongly and repeatedly accuse me of stealing ~ MADGE FRIEL'S GOLD WATCH). Small world and all that.
Back to the false poster. The IP of the (forty seven names) poster is 86.159.225. (the last section is not added). This one poster also shows many "locations" too. In alphabetical order, and including the posters "location" where given, but not including the times they posted twice under one of the names ("Holly", "Trina", "Lillian" "Tessa", "Moira" and "Trish"), here are the FORTY ONE names used by this poster:
Averil P (Mayo), Beth (Florida, USA), Charlotte (Cresslough), Crystal (Palm Springs), Cyril (Dub), Deirdre (Dublin), Dick Whiitington, Elizabeth Doyle (Dublin), Eva (Coolard), Ex solicitors wife (Tipp), Felicity, Fred (Dublin), Gina (Stoke-on-Trent), Holly (Clare), Ida Platterman, Leeann (Galway), Leo (Shannon), Lillian (Dublin), Margaret Johnson (Letterkenny), Miss Pimms, Moira (Donegal), P.D. (Donegal Town), Paddy Kinnan, Padraig (Donegal), Petra, Reta (Sunshine state), S.S. (Dublin), Seamus, Sgt Pepper (Manchester), Sheila, Shelf stacker (Letterkenny), Sinead, T.T (Donegal), Taiel Assaf (Ballsbridge, Dublin), Tessa (Dublin), Tom, Tony (Inner city), Trina (Dub), Trish, Victor, AND FINALLY, Willie (Mayo). Note to "Charlotte", Creeslough is not spelled "Cresslough".
Whilst it may be amusing to think that this rampant poster (who by the way, is using eircom as their ISP, a fact eircom might be quite interested in as many of the posts are, predictably, abusive and therefore against eircom's terms of use), it is also a blatant disregard for any genuine visitors to their sites who are searching for guidance or help. If they can't be trusted to run a guestbook decently and honestly, which we know already from the vile abuse they allow be posted there they can't, but now proof positive that they make up user names to write prolifically on the guestbook, then how on earth could ANYONE trust anything they say or do?
It is just not possible.
And finally, on the subject of their guestbook, this, the first post on their then new guestbook on the 7th of November 2010 at 20:16:07:
"Name: VLPS Email: lawyercatcher @ lawyer.com Web: http:// www. crookedlawyers.com
Location: Ireland Number: 1
The guestbook company we were using has gone out of business so a new guestbook has been set up.
Unfortunately, messages posted after Sept 2006 are lost, unless someone else has saved them"
In reply to that I would say, firstly, what kind of absolute grade A plonkers run a site and have no copies saved?
Secondly and in reply to the post I would say to "lawyercatcher", I have!
Every single one going right back to the very beginning both in hard copy and on a computer especially dedicated and used only for the VLPS and the rateyoursolicitor group and all their writings. Feel free to email me to ask for them.
Friday, February 10, 2012
TELEPHONE CALLS AND TEXT MESSAGES
FRIDAY 10 FEBRUARY 2012
I have been receiving a lot of text messages from a core insider of the VLPS group. Many of the texts gave "insider" information that only a person very closely linked to them could know.
It all started with a phone call in the very early hours of Christmas Day last which as you can imagine caused a bit of a fright to receive a telephone call so early on Christmas morning. Following that telephone call, I was contacted on numerous occasions thereafter via text messages.
The texts continued over the course of the last six weeks with various snippets of information on the main people involved in the VLPS.
They culminated, after copious texting yesterday, with abusive and very threatening text messages into the very early hours of this morning.
Incidentally, prior to the texts taking a very serious downturn this morning, I had had no intention to post them here.
All the text from the very first one are currently being transcribed and I will add them here shortly.
UPDATE. In the interim, a photo of my (very battered) mobile phone showing a recent text from the VLPS insider to me informing me that despite the High Court Order of Justice Michael Peart (Tansey -v- Gill), the site was still online. NB: Obviously I have blocked out the texters mobile number at the top of the texters post to me.
I have been receiving a lot of text messages from a core insider of the VLPS group. Many of the texts gave "insider" information that only a person very closely linked to them could know.
It all started with a phone call in the very early hours of Christmas Day last which as you can imagine caused a bit of a fright to receive a telephone call so early on Christmas morning. Following that telephone call, I was contacted on numerous occasions thereafter via text messages.
The texts continued over the course of the last six weeks with various snippets of information on the main people involved in the VLPS.
They culminated, after copious texting yesterday, with abusive and very threatening text messages into the very early hours of this morning.
Incidentally, prior to the texts taking a very serious downturn this morning, I had had no intention to post them here.
All the text from the very first one are currently being transcribed and I will add them here shortly.
UPDATE. In the interim, a photo of my (very battered) mobile phone showing a recent text from the VLPS insider to me informing me that despite the High Court Order of Justice Michael Peart (Tansey -v- Gill), the site was still online. NB: Obviously I have blocked out the texters mobile number at the top of the texters post to me.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
