Showing posts with label rateyoursolicitor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rateyoursolicitor. Show all posts

Sunday, February 12, 2012

VLPS GUESTBOOK EXPOSED

I have long known and said that the VLPS/crookedlawyers.com guestbook entries are from a small core group using various names and NOT genuine posters.  But what else would anyone expect when the postings on their rateyoursolcitor.com site were mainly by a small band of repeat posters using different names? 

And now I have the undeniable proof.~ numerous  posters there with the same IP.

Tomorrow I will post the proof. 

It will take me hours to actually correlate all these bogus posters into one segment here.  Hang in there.

They will be here tomorrow Sunday 12th of February 2012.

SUNDAY 12TH FEBRUARY 2012

Before you begin, I must warn you that this is a long read with a lot of detail so pour yourself a cuppa before you begin ...

The guestbook on crookedlawyers.com now displays a posters IP address (or the first three sets of digits of the IP address I should say).

This has been done for one of two reasons:

1.  The VLPS themselves decided to do this.

2.  The guestbook provider FORCED them do it.

Time will tell which of the two are correct. 

But, if, after this blog post in which I will expose beyond any shadow of doubt their disingenuous ways, the IP identity of posters on their guestbook disappear or are no longer shown, then it is option 1 above.  If it was their own doing, they created a spectacular own goal with that one.

However if they remain, we can only assume that it is option 2 above and their guestbook provider no longer trusts them and is, to say the very least, nervous of the way in which the VLPS conduct themselves on the internet and how they abuse the free guestbook on crookedlawyers.com.  Perhaps my VLPS insider texter informed on them?

Now, back to the postings on the guestbook.  I looked over the postings there between the dates of the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012 (the date I learned the guestbook was still online from my VLPS insider).

There are 379 posts between the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012.

Of them 21 are by John Gill (ironically 21 is the number of piano concerti by the great composer Mozart, and 21 posts from John Gill who can't even compose himself, even in his pink shirt and hipster flares).

107 are by Eugene Cafferky, (who seems to spend his time lecturing to no-one given that I suspect most readers of the guestbook, like me, just pass over his rantings).

118 are by the unlucky-in-love and prolific poster, Michael Bradshaw.  (You will remember him as the man who canonised John Gill and adoringly called him St. John), although by the look of the guestbook in the past few days he seems to be all out of love for the "hero" he once openly adored).  Posted by Michael Bradshaw 10/02/2012 "'Frankies nite Club' come and see Gill 'boppin' in his flared trousers and Ben Sherman shirt , he likes the pinky ones and watch those hipsters move. and dont buy his new book because if it's anything like the last one it must be appalling , did i tell you Gill had sidekick Carraher delivering boxes of his last worst seller to their legal friends in Bray , 'Hinge and Bracket' as they're known in Bray , Hinge and Bracket and no Door".  The image of diminutive John Gill boppin' in his flared hipsters and pink shirt is an image many us will now think of when we hear of him.  That and the Brillo-pad 'do.

13 are by Joe Ferris (who in his own words is "Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" (Derry) (imagine HIM teaching your kids?!) but whom I think rather fancies himself as a bit of a Rumpole of the Bailey if we look at his favourite turns of speech: "Would the VLPS agree that" and "Could it be argued" (does he prance around his bedroom in a wig and gown in front of a mirror?).

And finally, 6 postings by Sean Carraher who seems to have some sort of major gripe with the Gardai.

So they total 265 posts of the 379 posts we are discussing here.  That leaves 114 posts not attributed to them.

First, the IP address.  The first digits of any IP address indicates the ISP (internet service provider).  If we take those for posters for example here, John Gill's IP address begins with 86 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is eircom.  Michael Bradshaw's is 79 which in Ireland indicates that his ISP is Upc.  Eugene Cafferky's is 92 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is Hutchinson 3g Ireland.  Outside of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) these ISPs will be from other providers.  For instance, Joe Ferris has two: one his home one and one his work or mobile.  The ISPs in his case are Virgin Media and Talktalk UK.  If the second one is not his mobile and is his work then I am not at all sure his bosses would like to know that he uses their computers and time to be doing his VLPS business.

My own IP starts with 93 (vodafone) and NOT the one (82) of the poster on their guestbook using my name and location (31st December 2011).

So that briefly explains about the first two digits of the IP address.

Now on the guestbook, as I said, we have 114 posts from the 1st of January 2012 to the 8th of February 2012 not attributed to the "famous five" (Gill, Cafferky, Bradshaw, Ferris,and Carraher).

Of that 114, 47, yes FORTY SEVEN "posters" have the one IP address.  And of those 47, 29 are about me!  What else woulld I expect?

That is over 41% of them (luckily I have a husband with a great brain for maths to save me reaching for a calculator to work that out!).  Coincidentally my husband was taught maths by two people who are connected, one indirectly and the other very directly, to our case with the Gallaghers.  His maths teachers were Fr. Carr, now Parish Priest in Daniel and Elva Gallagher's parish, and Fr. McMahon who inherited and received the gold watch that the Gallaghers wrongly and repeatedly accuse me of stealing ~ MADGE FRIEL'S GOLD WATCH).  Small world and all that.

Back to the false poster.  The IP of the (forty seven names) poster is 86.159.225. (the last section is not added).  This one poster also shows many "locations" too.  In alphabetical order, and including the posters "location" where given, but not including the times they posted twice under one of the names ("Holly", "Trina", "Lillian" "Tessa", "Moira" and "Trish"), here are  the FORTY ONE names used by this poster:

Averil P (Mayo), Beth (Florida, USA), Charlotte (Cresslough), Crystal (Palm Springs), Cyril (Dub), Deirdre (Dublin), Dick Whiitington, Elizabeth Doyle (Dublin), Eva (Coolard), Ex solicitors wife (Tipp), Felicity, Fred (Dublin), Gina (Stoke-on-Trent), Holly (Clare), Ida Platterman, Leeann (Galway), Leo (Shannon), Lillian (Dublin), Margaret Johnson (Letterkenny), Miss Pimms, Moira (Donegal), P.D. (Donegal Town), Paddy Kinnan, Padraig (Donegal), Petra, Reta (Sunshine state), S.S. (Dublin), Seamus, Sgt Pepper (Manchester), Sheila, Shelf stacker (Letterkenny), Sinead, T.T (Donegal), Taiel Assaf (Ballsbridge, Dublin), Tessa (Dublin), Tom, Tony (Inner city), Trina (Dub), Trish, Victor, AND FINALLY,  Willie (Mayo).  Note to "Charlotte", Creeslough is not spelled "Cresslough".
Whilst it may be amusing to think that this rampant poster (who by the way, is using eircom as their ISP, a fact eircom might be quite interested in as many of the posts are, predictably, abusive and therefore against eircom's terms of use), it is also a blatant disregard for any genuine visitors to their sites who are searching for guidance or help. 

If they can't be trusted to run a guestbook decently and honestly, which we know already from the vile abuse they allow be posted there they can't, but now proof positive that they make up user names to write prolifically on the guestbook, then how on earth could ANYONE trust anything they say or do? 

It is just not possible.

And finally, on the subject of their guestbook, this, the first post on their then new guestbook on the 7th of November 2010 at 20:16:07:

"Name: VLPS   Email: lawyercatcher @ lawyer.com  Web: http:// www. crookedlawyers.com

Location: Ireland     Number: 1

The guestbook company we were using has gone out of business so a new guestbook has been set up.


Unfortunately, messages posted after Sept 2006 are lost, unless someone else has saved them"

In reply to that I would say, firstly, what kind of absolute grade A plonkers run a site and have no copies saved?

Secondly and in reply to the post I would say to "lawyercatcher", I have! 

Every single one going right back to the very beginning both in hard copy and on a computer especially dedicated and used only for the VLPS and the rateyoursolicitor group and all their writings.  Feel free to email me to ask for them.

Monday, November 21, 2011

THE STALKING STUPIDS

Honestly, these people from rateyoursolicitor and crookedlawyers (VLPS) are beyond stupid.

They stalk me all over the internet, obsessed as they are with me.  They really should consider getting a life that does not include me.

Today, once again they tried to join a forum I am a member of, once again using a ridiculous user name and proxy (poxy?) IP address.  This once again exemplifies their supreme stupidity.

To those idiots: YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MY LOVELY FORUM.

Go elsewhere and see if you can find a life.  Of sorts.

Friday, November 18, 2011

BREEDING PUPS

I noticed a post their cesspit site (vlps/crookedlawyers.com) saying I was running a puppy farm, breeding pups for sale.

This is just another of their nasty lies.

1.  We have NEVER bought a pup from a puppy farm nor a pet shop. 

2.  All the dogs we have had were bought as pups from reputable breeders whom we had checked out at length prior to purchasing.  By checking out, we made sure that they were Kennel Club (either Irish or British) registered, not because that is a total safety valve, but rather that we could see how many litters they had bred from their dogs and how regularly.

3.  We have had many pedigree dogs over the years and have NEVER bred as much as one pup.  My opinion is that there are far too many dogs in the world as it is and that is the reason I have never had our dogs bred.  And believe me, were I the type to do it, I would have made quite a sum of money as they were all expensive dogs.

4.  We have never even allowed our male pedigree dogs to be used at stud.  Our Shar-Pei at the time could have earned £800 per breeding and although we were asked by owners in Galway to use our dog, we refused because we a) did not buy our Shar-Pei to make money and b) as stated previously there are far too many puppies being bred.

5.  Our dog now is an English Bull Terrier and we have had him now for over seven years.  We had him neutered when he was a few months old despite the fact that he could be used at stud as an adult for up to £1,000 a time.

So, no, we have never had a puppy farm and have never bought from one, and more, have never even seen a puppy farm (other than TV progs. of course).

But just another example of the hate campaign and lies against us on their cesspit sites.

To end on a happy note though, here's our fabulous Alf.  A charming, loving, clever and very loyal eight stone mass of solid muscle.

Alf says "hello"

DANIEL GALLAGHER'S FATHER'S WILL

Let's clear some things up here.

Daniel Gallagher, represented by his wife Elva (the close friend and constant companion of John Gill, (St. John aka The Lone Ranger aka Dick Turpin) continually bangs on about the Will of Madge Friel and his "ancestoral home" and his imagined entitlements thereto ... 

... this post will be completed later today ... hang in there!

THE STUPID LIES

I know their cesspit sites (rateyoursolictor and crookedlawyers/vlps) are packed with lies but some of them are more stupid than others.  Take the following examples:
"Breaking the law seems to run in the McGynn family. I watched the officer of the Court and his accomplice wife down a bottle of alcoholic wine and jump behind the steering wheel of their car and drive into the sunset narrowly escaping the Polestar Roundabout in Letterkenny, Ireland. Clearly they think they are above the drink driving laws of Ireland too."
This post is wrong on so many levels, most importantly the idea that the poster, supposedly a waiter in a local restaurant, would watch customers "down a bottle of alcoholic wine and jump behind the steering wheel of their car" and instead of suggesting a taxi before they did so, or had they failed to, called the gardai to report it, thought: "first thing tomorrow I must post this on a cesspit website?"  It doesn't say much about the morals of this poster (were he genuine). 
Incidentally, at the date of that post and with a meal over the course of 2 hours such a driver would not have been over the legal limit.But the truth of the matter is that we NEVER take the car if we are having drinks with a meal.  A taxi in Letterkenny is only €5 to the restaurant and €5 home.  Would anyone really risk an accident or losing their licence for the sake of TEN EURO?  Hardly! 
And further, at the date of that post we had been out in Letterkenny restaurants on only three occasions in the previous year so I know which restaurants they were and I know the owners and staff who would not have posted such a thing as they ALL know we ALWAYS take taxis.
But ALL that apart, the one thing that shows that this poster is not genuine and has absolutely NO idea of the layout of Letterkenny let alone work here is this:

"and drive into the sunset narrowly escaping the Polestar Roundabout in Letterkenny, Ireland."

Letterkenny town, where the restaurants are located is the the EAST of the Polestar Roundabout.

As everyone (except this poster) knows, the sun sets in the west.

It would therefore be IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to drive into the sunset driving from Letterkenny town to the Polestar Roundabout.

And another ridiculous poster:

"cathrine Mcglynn yet again reversed onto the public road this morning almost killing me and my children! This is a contravention of the Highway code and in breech of the law! Once again she disregards the laws of Ireland. Al other UK drivers adhere to the laws of this country why shouldn't she."

Leaving aside the lack of punctuation and misspellings, clearly this poster is lying.  And how do I (and every single person who knows me) know this for a 100% fact?

I DO NOT DRIVE.  I can drive but haven't driven in many, many years and I have never driven the car we have now (and have had for a number of years) EVER.  And I never drove any of at least the last three cars we have owned.

These people who own and write posts on the sites really need to get at least simple facts right.  I know they know nothing about the law but simple things like the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is surely something very basic and not above even their, albeit limited, intelligence

Their limited intelligence is a problem for those people they are advising (payment in cash, tax free don't forget) would be unfortunate enough (especially for those who took their advice and landed in  jail) but it also allows the readers of their cesspit sites who know they are lying a laugh at the irony of their (stolen from the Joe Duffy show according to their site) "You Can Never Improve On The Truth". 

The quote by Noam Chomsky explains why they lie: "It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the Truth and expose lies." 

Using lack of intelligence as a mitigating factor, perhaps they are excused their lies, because, let's face it, between them they scarcely have enough brain power to power a small torch. 

Thursday, November 10, 2011

"A NASTY, SCRUFFY, HORRIBLE, LITTLE BULLY"

From the VLPS/crookedlawers guestbook:

"Date: 21/10/2011, 19:56:16 ~ Name: Truth ~ Number: 3,091

Have Victims of The Legal Profession become Victims of John Gill.


The VLPS has been taken control of by a Nasty Scruffy Horrible Little Bully.


The dysfunctionality of The VLPS a victims support group is extrordinary. This guestbook controlled with messages regularly removed, The Rate Your Solicitor Site closed to new postings, public meetings for victims prohibited, no membership registration, no democratically elected management structure, not a single AGM in 10 years and not one genuine victim assisted through the courts to a successful outcome.


Who is John Gill and why is he controlling The VLPS ? ? ?."

Dear Truth

Of course they are all victims of John Gill.  But the site has not been taken control of by him, the site is owned, run and more importantly, controlled by him. 

John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin), with his friend and close companion, Elva Gallagher, only really want to bang, albeit impotently, their own drums.  They care not a jot about other members there other than to take a few quid off them (tax free of course). 

Sadly, there are people out there who are innocent enough to actually think this little man can do anything for them.  Well, other than land a few of them in jail ~ himself included ~ that is. 

John Gill has got exactly nowhere in his own quest to right what he perceives as wrongs against him and now he has the added bother of someone pursuing him for his slanderous rantings.  His cup positively overflows.

But he is not totally alone.  He always has constant companion and close friend Elva (wife of Daniel Gallagher) but he also has a few "birds of a feather" around him. 

People, some of whom are almost illiterate (as evidenced by their writings on his guestbook), and people too who will jump on any bandwagon going to tear others apart ~ as long, of course, as they have the anonymity of the internet and a screen in front of them.

These people, his little band of followers, worship the ground he prances around on as he continues his quest for victory, old, saggy, wrinkly thing by his side (I refer here not to his close friend and constant companion Elva, but rather, his large satchel) over every person and every organisation that ever slighted him in any way.  The fact that some of these slights may be figments of his florid imagination is neither here nor there to John Gill. 

He is a little man with many big chips scattered between and on both shoulders and a little man who will not give up, driven as he is by his own demons, and cheered on by said band of followers.  Some of whom are starting to wonder exactly what they got into when they first believed his diatribes.

But "a nasty, scruffy, horrible little bully"?  Well, people can make up their own minds on whether that is a close despcription of him or not.

I tend to think of him as a sad, little man to whom both life and mother nature have dealt some hard blows and because of these he can no longer think, speak nor work with any semblence of rationality.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

THE LONE RANGER OR DICK TURPIN?

It seems St. John, The Lone Ranger  may not be as saintly as his adoring fans ( for adoring fans read John Gill himself and his companion, Elva Gallagher) tell people via their two sites (victims of the legal profession exposed/crooked lawyers and rate your solicitor ~ which are one and the same.  From the Irish Independent of the 10th November 2005:

"A group calling itself Victims of the Legal Profession Society (VLPS) has purchased the domain name rate your solicitor .com"

But because of recent information received, I am seriously considering changing his name from The Lone Ranger to Dick Turpin.

Why?

This registered bankrupt is charging a hefty fee for his "wisdom".  In cash. 

The fee John Gill is charging is €250 per hour!

Yes, you read that correctly.  TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY CASH AN HOUR.

Not bad for a man who has not an iota on matters legal.  (Remember how many people he has advised, which advice when taken has earned them visits to our jails?).

Back to the fee Dick Turpin, St. John, The Lone Ranger is charging. 

If he "worked" a standard 39 hour week this would yield him a massive €9,750 a week

NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOR 39 HOURS WORK.  

In cash.  Tax free. 

Which for a month of our 5 day weeks would be €39,000.

Which would yield an annual income of €468,000 ~ nearly HALF A MILLION EURO!

But for the sake of fairness, let's say he only works half a week ~ nineteen and a half hours.

In a half week he would earn €4,875.

In a month that would be €19,500.

And the annual income, working only half a week for each week of the year, would earn him €234,000.  CASH.  TAX FREE.

If John Gill "worked" for one year (earning at €250 an hour for a 39 hour week, €468,000) he would be earning €268,000 more than the Taoiseach, Enda Kenny.  And, unlike John Gill/Dick Turpin, Enda Kenny will be heavily taxed on his earnings.

Nice work if you can get it.

Caveat emptor.