http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-why-this-site-is.html ), one of the postings on the crookedlawyers.com Guestbook by someone who calls himself Absolute Lunatic has mysteriously disappeared.
These 2 postings are still there:
"In India throwing Acid in someone (sic) face is perfectly acceptable means of figting (sic) crime. Ireland needs a similar method."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th September 2006 and is still there as of todays date (21st of of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Wakeupcall
Country:
Date: Sun Sep 10 03:29:44 2006
Comment: I don't blame Solicitors I blame all the cheats and scammers who thing having a large family is a good enough reason to take whatever they want to better themselves. Solicitors are dirty and take money under the table all the time its human nature for them to do that. Ireland's laws need to focus more on fraud than any other crime. In India throwing Acid in someone face is perfectly acceptable means of figting crime. Ireland needs a similar method
"In America if a Solicitor/Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 10th of July 2006 and is still there as of today's date (21st of November 2008).
The full post:
Name: Good Night
Country: USA
Date: Mon Jul 10 00:21:39 2006
Comment: I am a American who family comes from Ireland. I guess that most Irish are very Peaceful people who blame themselves for problems caused by Solicitors. I read articles on victims of Solicitors who had there entire life savings as well as their homes taken by Solicitors. I find it strange that these victims are committing Suicide so soon. In America if a Solicitor/ Lawyer stole from a client he or she would be hunted down and killed and then the client would then commit suicide.
The post that has mysteriously disappeared:
"... the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats."
This appeared on their guestbook on the 7th of September 2006, was still when I posted it here on the 12th of November 2008, and now it has gone.
The full post:
Name: Absolute Lunatic
Country: Rockall
Date: Thu Sep 7 20:19:16 2006
Comment: I would like to comment on Imelda (sic) asertion (sic) that this forum is for lazy malicious cowards. She is right the best way to get my point across is to kidnapp (sic) and torture crooked Solicitors. I find that to be the best method to deal with these Rats.
That post, unitl I posted it on this blog on the 12th of November 2008, had been on page 10 (currently) of the Guestbook and had been there for OVER 2 YEARS slotted in between these two posts that remain as of this date:
Name: Bernard
Country: Ireland
Date: Fri Sep 8 18:35:56 2006
Comment: Liam, have you ever tried to make a complaint against a solicitor through the so called 'legitimate channels'? Unfortunately consumers have no other option but to try 'ranting' on websites to encourage change. How many solicitors have been stopped from practicing by the law society due to misconduct? Answer: zero! How about the redress board scandal? How many solicitors have been punished for stealing from those victims? Answer: Zero. They got a slap on the wrist!
Name: Liam
Country: Ireland
Date: Thu Sep 7 18:31:00 2006
Comment: Bernard, I agree fully with Imelda. Nobody is denying that there are bad apples in the legal profession, but the malicious scattergun approach taken by the so called victims of the legal profession society is simply an extended rant, and it lacks all credibility. You can practically feel the sparks from the huge axe they are grinding. There are legitimate channels for ventilating complaints against members of the legal profession. Those with personal vendettas need not apply.
For the information of people reading, a poster on a Guestbook cannot remove his posting therefore the people/person ( link: http://victimsofthelegalprofessionexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/rate-your-solicitor-dot-com-tdi-mill.html ) who own/run the site are the only one/s who can remove it. Which begs the question: why would that one post be removed when other offensive posts remain?
So who is the 'Absolute Lunatic'?. And why did s/he have that post removed? Could it be that the owner/s of crookedlawyers.com might have to give up the identity of the 'Absolute Lunatic' if called upon to so do? And in so doing would the identity of the Absolute Lunatic totally embarass crookedlawyers.com and the VLPS? It certainly looks that way.
Posts
