Yes, yes, yes, I should have uploaded the review I did of John Gills "tome".
But in the past two weeks SO much information, not to mention movements, are upon us.
We have had information given to us about how Elva Gallagher and her husband Daniel Gallagher did VERY bad things to Madge Friel.
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a VERY bad person,
Elva Gallagher has been revealed as a liar, a possible thief, and at the very least the instigator of law breaking activities on Madge Friel, the woman whom they lie about.
Keep up.
I will update.
Showing posts with label vlps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vlps. Show all posts
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Monday, May 28, 2012
AND NOW WE LEARN WHO WAS POSTING
The great upshot of Damien Tansey winning his case against John Gill is that he has been given all data from the host of Rate Your Solicitor.com, dotster.com
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
This of course means that all those who have had nasty comments and lies printed about them on the site can gain access to those records and the anonymous posters true identity and location.
The upshot of having access to this information is that:
1. The anonymous posters will be revealed as what they are: nasty, evil little people spouting lies and hatred from what they thought was the safety of their computer.
And
2. It will probably open the floodgates on defamation cases taken against any formerly anonymous posters who felt free to type lies on Rate Your Solicitor.
I know I for one await this access eagerly.
And once gained, I will post openly here the names of those who lied about me and my husband.
And I will do so with relish.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
THESE PEOPLE ACTUALLY SUPPORT THREATINGING A BABY
After you read the following and what they are doing with my baby grandchild, scroll down to the end to see what they did on their guestbook when I tried to post. (Updates to this post can be seen at the end of it).
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
These people of the VLPS/rateyoursolicitor sites really are the scum of the earth! They have plumbed the depths with this one. Targeting a baby!
Who, but they, would support threats to a BABY?!
A baby that they are happy to target simply because this innocent child is my baby granddaughter.
She is also the daughter of an American citizen and as we all know, and know well, Americans protect their own with a vengeance and will do their utmost to make sure that no harm comes to them or their children.
As this poster or posters have mentioned a baby, daughter of an American citizen, I am passing on EVERYTHING I have on them to the F.B.I, and asking that they be investigated immediately. This will include their being able to get the full name and address of the poster on the VLPS guestbook directly from the guestbook provider.
The information I pass will also include the proxy IP used by their member who joined an internet forum specifically and solely so they could send me a private message via that forum telling me that they know exactly where my son and his family live in America.
This person should be aware that a proxy IP holds no sway with the F.B.I. as they are one of the only people who can demand a proxy IP provider immediately gives up the actual IP of the person (and therefore their name and address) who took the proxy IP.
The VLPS can remove the posts if they wish ~ I care not. I have every single one saved.
And remember, it was these people who ALLOWED the posts to remain on their guestbook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I have now spoken to a very high profile American who tells me that the person/s who did the threat on the VLPS guestbook and in messages to me about my baby grandchild can be immediately investigated by the F.B.I. under the Child Welfare Protection Act under sections 14a/b/and probably c.
*****
UPDATE 13 February 2012
I tried to ask John Gill to comment on the attack on my grandchild and I got this:
"Temporarily blocked! Access was denied for your network and/or this service. Sometimes our filter functions are wrong, we are sorry if this is the case. Unfortunately we have no additional information about this error message. Please try again in a couple of hours"
CLEARLY Mr. Gill agrees with the attacking of a baby.
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
So after just short of TWENTY FOUR HOURS and no posting on their guestbook, let alone a reply to my request to John Gill to answer why he has allowed one of their members, if not more, to target a baby, John Gill does post.
Did he reply and address the matter?
Of course not!
He just went on to bang on about another member of the VLPS, totally ignoring anything about the baby they are targeting.
It did stop the guestbook in their tracks though. Nearly 24 hours without any of them posting. Which tells me one of two things:
1. Their members actually liked seeing John Gill "on the spit" as it were.
OR
2. They aren't posting because future readers of their guestbook will think that the next poster cared less about a baby too.
Or possibly both of the above.
Either way, John Gill must answer and tell me why he supports the targeting of a baby both on their guestbook and by a message sent to me by one of them telling me they know exactly where our son and his family live in America (the message said the state too by the way). I have a copy of the proxy IP used for that message. Which as we know, can be traced now.
This morning (15th February 2012) I have posted the question yet again, half expecting not to be allowed to do so. But I was probably because if they ban me, I will report it back here immediately.
We will wait and see if John Gill answers why they support the targeting of a baby both by allowing posts on their guestbook and by sending messages to me.
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012 ~ Minutes later
Minutes after the above, my post has gone. Deleted, removed, gone! Clearly this is touching a nerve with the VLPS and their heads are fully buried in the sand thinking by ignoring it, it will go away.
IT WON'T!
*****
UPDATE 15 FEBRUARY 2012
My post is back, sandwiched now between two posts by John Gill who managed to pull his head out of the sand for a moment to get back to his favourite subject: himself and his fight with Damien Tansey. Once again John Gill proves to readers of their guestbook that the only thing of importance is HIM. Forget trying to redeem any shred of credibility the VLPS might have following their support in the targeting a baby, he choses instead to only think of John. It really is all me, me, me with this little man.
*****
UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2012
As expected, John Gill has totally ignored my requests via their guestbook that he explain how the VLPS can support the targeting of a baby.
What I was a little surprised at, was that one of the only people who seem to be in employment in that group, Joe Ferris (remember him? "a Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" Derry), has too ignored the targeting of a baby, instead deciding that he would post copiously, said posts actually managing to get a dig in to my husband! I find it almost impossible to beleive that a man who obviously has a modicum of intelligence ~ he would have needed some brain power to be as he says "a Nurse Lecturer", would condone the targeting of a baby. Which by his postings show he clearly is.
*****
VLPS GUESTBOOK EXPOSED
I have long known and said that the VLPS/crookedlawyers.com guestbook entries are from a small core group using various names and NOT genuine posters. But what else would anyone expect when the postings on their rateyoursolcitor.com site were mainly by a small band of repeat posters using different names?
And now I have the undeniable proof.~ numerous posters there with the same IP.
Tomorrow I will post the proof.
It will take me hours to actually correlate all these bogus posters into one segment here. Hang in there.
They will be here tomorrow Sunday 12th of February 2012.
SUNDAY 12TH FEBRUARY 2012
Before you begin, I must warn you that this is a long read with a lot of detail so pour yourself a cuppa before you begin ...
The guestbook on crookedlawyers.com now displays a posters IP address (or the first three sets of digits of the IP address I should say).
This has been done for one of two reasons:
1. The VLPS themselves decided to do this.
2. The guestbook provider FORCED them do it.
Time will tell which of the two are correct.
But, if, after this blog post in which I will expose beyond any shadow of doubt their disingenuous ways, the IP identity of posters on their guestbook disappear or are no longer shown, then it is option 1 above. If it was their own doing, they created a spectacular own goal with that one.
However if they remain, we can only assume that it is option 2 above and their guestbook provider no longer trusts them and is, to say the very least, nervous of the way in which the VLPS conduct themselves on the internet and how they abuse the free guestbook on crookedlawyers.com. Perhaps my VLPS insider texter informed on them?
Now, back to the postings on the guestbook. I looked over the postings there between the dates of the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012 (the date I learned the guestbook was still online from my VLPS insider).
There are 379 posts between the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012.
Of them 21 are by John Gill (ironically 21 is the number of piano concerti by the great composer Mozart, and 21 posts from John Gill who can't even compose himself, even in his pink shirt and hipster flares).
107 are by Eugene Cafferky, (who seems to spend his time lecturing to no-one given that I suspect most readers of the guestbook, like me, just pass over his rantings).
118 are by the unlucky-in-love and prolific poster, Michael Bradshaw. (You will remember him as the man who canonised John Gill and adoringly called him St. John), although by the look of the guestbook in the past few days he seems to be all out of love for the "hero" he once openly adored). Posted by Michael Bradshaw 10/02/2012 "'Frankies nite Club' come and see Gill 'boppin' in his flared trousers and Ben Sherman shirt , he likes the pinky ones and watch those hipsters move. and dont buy his new book because if it's anything like the last one it must be appalling , did i tell you Gill had sidekick Carraher delivering boxes of his last worst seller to their legal friends in Bray , 'Hinge and Bracket' as they're known in Bray , Hinge and Bracket and no Door". The image of diminutive John Gill boppin' in his flared hipsters and pink shirt is an image many us will now think of when we hear of him. That and the Brillo-pad 'do.
13 are by Joe Ferris (who in his own words is "Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" (Derry) (imagine HIM teaching your kids?!) but whom I think rather fancies himself as a bit of a Rumpole of the Bailey if we look at his favourite turns of speech: "Would the VLPS agree that" and "Could it be argued" (does he prance around his bedroom in a wig and gown in front of a mirror?).
And finally, 6 postings by Sean Carraher who seems to have some sort of major gripe with the Gardai.
So they total 265 posts of the 379 posts we are discussing here. That leaves 114 posts not attributed to them.
First, the IP address. The first digits of any IP address indicates the ISP (internet service provider). If we take those for posters for example here, John Gill's IP address begins with 86 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is eircom. Michael Bradshaw's is 79 which in Ireland indicates that his ISP is Upc. Eugene Cafferky's is 92 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is Hutchinson 3g Ireland. Outside of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) these ISPs will be from other providers. For instance, Joe Ferris has two: one his home one and one his work or mobile. The ISPs in his case are Virgin Media and Talktalk UK. If the second one is not his mobile and is his work then I am not at all sure his bosses would like to know that he uses their computers and time to be doing his VLPS business.
My own IP starts with 93 (vodafone) and NOT the one (82) of the poster on their guestbook using my name and location (31st December 2011).
So that briefly explains about the first two digits of the IP address.
Now on the guestbook, as I said, we have 114 posts from the 1st of January 2012 to the 8th of February 2012 not attributed to the "famous five" (Gill, Cafferky, Bradshaw, Ferris,and Carraher).
Of that 114, 47, yes FORTY SEVEN "posters" have the one IP address. And of those 47, 29 are about me! What else woulld I expect?
That is over 41% of them (luckily I have a husband with a great brain for maths to save me reaching for a calculator to work that out!). Coincidentally my husband was taught maths by two people who are connected, one indirectly and the other very directly, to our case with the Gallaghers. His maths teachers were Fr. Carr, now Parish Priest in Daniel and Elva Gallagher's parish, and Fr. McMahon who inherited and received the gold watch that the Gallaghers wrongly and repeatedly accuse me of stealing ~ MADGE FRIEL'S GOLD WATCH). Small world and all that.
Back to the false poster. The IP of the (forty seven names) poster is 86.159.225. (the last section is not added). This one poster also shows many "locations" too. In alphabetical order, and including the posters "location" where given, but not including the times they posted twice under one of the names ("Holly", "Trina", "Lillian" "Tessa", "Moira" and "Trish"), here are the FORTY ONE names used by this poster:
If they can't be trusted to run a guestbook decently and honestly, which we know already from the vile abuse they allow be posted there they can't, but now proof positive that they make up user names to write prolifically on the guestbook, then how on earth could ANYONE trust anything they say or do?
It is just not possible.
And finally, on the subject of their guestbook, this, the first post on their then new guestbook on the 7th of November 2010 at 20:16:07:
"Name: VLPS Email: lawyercatcher @ lawyer.com Web: http:// www. crookedlawyers.com
Location: Ireland Number: 1
The guestbook company we were using has gone out of business so a new guestbook has been set up.
Unfortunately, messages posted after Sept 2006 are lost, unless someone else has saved them"
In reply to that I would say, firstly, what kind of absolute grade A plonkers run a site and have no copies saved?
Secondly and in reply to the post I would say to "lawyercatcher", I have!
Every single one going right back to the very beginning both in hard copy and on a computer especially dedicated and used only for the VLPS and the rateyoursolicitor group and all their writings. Feel free to email me to ask for them.
And now I have the undeniable proof.~ numerous posters there with the same IP.
Tomorrow I will post the proof.
It will take me hours to actually correlate all these bogus posters into one segment here. Hang in there.
They will be here tomorrow Sunday 12th of February 2012.
SUNDAY 12TH FEBRUARY 2012
Before you begin, I must warn you that this is a long read with a lot of detail so pour yourself a cuppa before you begin ...
The guestbook on crookedlawyers.com now displays a posters IP address (or the first three sets of digits of the IP address I should say).
This has been done for one of two reasons:
1. The VLPS themselves decided to do this.
2. The guestbook provider FORCED them do it.
Time will tell which of the two are correct.
But, if, after this blog post in which I will expose beyond any shadow of doubt their disingenuous ways, the IP identity of posters on their guestbook disappear or are no longer shown, then it is option 1 above. If it was their own doing, they created a spectacular own goal with that one.
However if they remain, we can only assume that it is option 2 above and their guestbook provider no longer trusts them and is, to say the very least, nervous of the way in which the VLPS conduct themselves on the internet and how they abuse the free guestbook on crookedlawyers.com. Perhaps my VLPS insider texter informed on them?
Now, back to the postings on the guestbook. I looked over the postings there between the dates of the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012 (the date I learned the guestbook was still online from my VLPS insider).
There are 379 posts between the 1st of January 2012 and the 8th of February 2012.
Of them 21 are by John Gill (ironically 21 is the number of piano concerti by the great composer Mozart, and 21 posts from John Gill who can't even compose himself, even in his pink shirt and hipster flares).
107 are by Eugene Cafferky, (who seems to spend his time lecturing to no-one given that I suspect most readers of the guestbook, like me, just pass over his rantings).
118 are by the unlucky-in-love and prolific poster, Michael Bradshaw. (You will remember him as the man who canonised John Gill and adoringly called him St. John), although by the look of the guestbook in the past few days he seems to be all out of love for the "hero" he once openly adored). Posted by Michael Bradshaw 10/02/2012 "'Frankies nite Club' come and see Gill 'boppin' in his flared trousers and Ben Sherman shirt , he likes the pinky ones and watch those hipsters move. and dont buy his new book because if it's anything like the last one it must be appalling , did i tell you Gill had sidekick Carraher delivering boxes of his last worst seller to their legal friends in Bray , 'Hinge and Bracket' as they're known in Bray , Hinge and Bracket and no Door". The image of diminutive John Gill boppin' in his flared hipsters and pink shirt is an image many us will now think of when we hear of him. That and the Brillo-pad 'do.
13 are by Joe Ferris (who in his own words is "Nurse Lecturer in the University of Ulster, Magee campus" (Derry) (imagine HIM teaching your kids?!) but whom I think rather fancies himself as a bit of a Rumpole of the Bailey if we look at his favourite turns of speech: "Would the VLPS agree that" and "Could it be argued" (does he prance around his bedroom in a wig and gown in front of a mirror?).
And finally, 6 postings by Sean Carraher who seems to have some sort of major gripe with the Gardai.
So they total 265 posts of the 379 posts we are discussing here. That leaves 114 posts not attributed to them.
First, the IP address. The first digits of any IP address indicates the ISP (internet service provider). If we take those for posters for example here, John Gill's IP address begins with 86 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is eircom. Michael Bradshaw's is 79 which in Ireland indicates that his ISP is Upc. Eugene Cafferky's is 92 which in Ireland indicates his ISP is Hutchinson 3g Ireland. Outside of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) these ISPs will be from other providers. For instance, Joe Ferris has two: one his home one and one his work or mobile. The ISPs in his case are Virgin Media and Talktalk UK. If the second one is not his mobile and is his work then I am not at all sure his bosses would like to know that he uses their computers and time to be doing his VLPS business.
My own IP starts with 93 (vodafone) and NOT the one (82) of the poster on their guestbook using my name and location (31st December 2011).
So that briefly explains about the first two digits of the IP address.
Now on the guestbook, as I said, we have 114 posts from the 1st of January 2012 to the 8th of February 2012 not attributed to the "famous five" (Gill, Cafferky, Bradshaw, Ferris,and Carraher).
Of that 114, 47, yes FORTY SEVEN "posters" have the one IP address. And of those 47, 29 are about me! What else woulld I expect?
That is over 41% of them (luckily I have a husband with a great brain for maths to save me reaching for a calculator to work that out!). Coincidentally my husband was taught maths by two people who are connected, one indirectly and the other very directly, to our case with the Gallaghers. His maths teachers were Fr. Carr, now Parish Priest in Daniel and Elva Gallagher's parish, and Fr. McMahon who inherited and received the gold watch that the Gallaghers wrongly and repeatedly accuse me of stealing ~ MADGE FRIEL'S GOLD WATCH). Small world and all that.
Back to the false poster. The IP of the (forty seven names) poster is 86.159.225. (the last section is not added). This one poster also shows many "locations" too. In alphabetical order, and including the posters "location" where given, but not including the times they posted twice under one of the names ("Holly", "Trina", "Lillian" "Tessa", "Moira" and "Trish"), here are the FORTY ONE names used by this poster:
Averil P (Mayo), Beth (Florida, USA), Charlotte (Cresslough), Crystal (Palm Springs), Cyril (Dub), Deirdre (Dublin), Dick Whiitington, Elizabeth Doyle (Dublin), Eva (Coolard), Ex solicitors wife (Tipp), Felicity, Fred (Dublin), Gina (Stoke-on-Trent), Holly (Clare), Ida Platterman, Leeann (Galway), Leo (Shannon), Lillian (Dublin), Margaret Johnson (Letterkenny), Miss Pimms, Moira (Donegal), P.D. (Donegal Town), Paddy Kinnan, Padraig (Donegal), Petra, Reta (Sunshine state), S.S. (Dublin), Seamus, Sgt Pepper (Manchester), Sheila, Shelf stacker (Letterkenny), Sinead, T.T (Donegal), Taiel Assaf (Ballsbridge, Dublin), Tessa (Dublin), Tom, Tony (Inner city), Trina (Dub), Trish, Victor, AND FINALLY, Willie (Mayo). Note to "Charlotte", Creeslough is not spelled "Cresslough".
Whilst it may be amusing to think that this rampant poster (who by the way, is using eircom as their ISP, a fact eircom might be quite interested in as many of the posts are, predictably, abusive and therefore against eircom's terms of use), it is also a blatant disregard for any genuine visitors to their sites who are searching for guidance or help. If they can't be trusted to run a guestbook decently and honestly, which we know already from the vile abuse they allow be posted there they can't, but now proof positive that they make up user names to write prolifically on the guestbook, then how on earth could ANYONE trust anything they say or do?
It is just not possible.
And finally, on the subject of their guestbook, this, the first post on their then new guestbook on the 7th of November 2010 at 20:16:07:
"Name: VLPS Email: lawyercatcher @ lawyer.com Web: http:// www. crookedlawyers.com
Location: Ireland Number: 1
The guestbook company we were using has gone out of business so a new guestbook has been set up.
Unfortunately, messages posted after Sept 2006 are lost, unless someone else has saved them"
In reply to that I would say, firstly, what kind of absolute grade A plonkers run a site and have no copies saved?
Secondly and in reply to the post I would say to "lawyercatcher", I have!
Every single one going right back to the very beginning both in hard copy and on a computer especially dedicated and used only for the VLPS and the rateyoursolicitor group and all their writings. Feel free to email me to ask for them.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
VLPS GUESTBOOK
Have to laugh. Despite these people purporting to support free speech, they block me from commenting on their guest book. Why? Well, God forbid anyone landing on their site should have any link to the truth.
But what made me laugh more tonight was the fact I did actually get putting comments there. For about five minutes. And then they realised it was me, posting the truth and each post I put was deleted.
But really, what sort of site is so scared shitless of the truth? Let me think. Clearly theirs.
Maybe it was my reference to a certain "saint" being in the same town as the Braying "ex-model"? Dumpsville. Word reached me about a certain marriage break up and whilst marriage break ups are not good, sometimes a wife has to do what wife has to do.
Still, might leave a said "saint" even more time to devote to a jailbird's wife or a flowery woman?
INTERESTING POINT: One thing their removing my comments within five minutes proves is that their guestbook is monitored, and thoroughly at that. This takes away ANY argument they might try to dredge up in defence of defamation posted there ~ THEY ACTIVELY NOT ONLY ALLOW IT, BUT ENCOURAGE IT.
UPDATE: Following this blog post I am now allowed to post!
But what made me laugh more tonight was the fact I did actually get putting comments there. For about five minutes. And then they realised it was me, posting the truth and each post I put was deleted.
But really, what sort of site is so scared shitless of the truth? Let me think. Clearly theirs.
Maybe it was my reference to a certain "saint" being in the same town as the Braying "ex-model"? Dumpsville. Word reached me about a certain marriage break up and whilst marriage break ups are not good, sometimes a wife has to do what wife has to do.
Still, might leave a said "saint" even more time to devote to a jailbird's wife or a flowery woman?
INTERESTING POINT: One thing their removing my comments within five minutes proves is that their guestbook is monitored, and thoroughly at that. This takes away ANY argument they might try to dredge up in defence of defamation posted there ~ THEY ACTIVELY NOT ONLY ALLOW IT, BUT ENCOURAGE IT.
UPDATE: Following this blog post I am now allowed to post!
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
MARGARET O'KANE
This person, Margaret O'Kane, who posts prolifically on the cesspit sites of VLPS (crookedlawyers.com and rateyoursolicitor.com) and purports to have a bed and breakfast in Dunkineely is, in my opinion, not a real person. "She" continually castigates me as a holiday home owner and yet this person seems not to exist.
There is NO-ONE in Dunkineely called Margaret O'Kane.
Google for bed and breakfast in Dunkineely and you will come up with nothing.
Margaret O'Kane in one post, defending my saying there was no such bed and breakfast owner, said something like 'oh, I must have been running a dog kennel for the past 20 years'. Dog kennel, run by a female? I hesitate to as that that would be a bitch.
But here's the deal.
If you, Margaret O'Kane, are real then let's meet face to face.
You (clearly) know who I am and where I live.
To you I throw down the challenge.
Tell me where to meet you and meet you I will. Face to face.
And if you ignore this, then I can only assume you are just another of the bogus posters, a figment of John Gill's limited imagination.
WATCH HERE FOR UPDATES PEOPLE.
And readers, check the Voters Roll for County Donegal and the name Margaret O'Kane http://www.donegal.ie/ereg/default.aspx
For MARGARET O'KANE, DUNKINEELY this is the result:
"Your Details could not be found. There are a few possible reasons : You are not on the Register of Electors
Fill in form RFA2 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
You are on the Register of Electors, but your details are incorrect
If you were previously on the Register Of Electors, but have changed address :
Fill in form RFA3 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
If your information is incorrect :
Please call Donegal County Councilon 074 9172238
Alternatively, try changing your search criteria and searching again.
Remember, if your house has a number, you must enter it.
SO, Margaret O'Kane, do step forward. Or John Gill just stop wearing ladies clothing and disguising yourself as Margaret O'Kane!
There is NO-ONE in Dunkineely called Margaret O'Kane.
Google for bed and breakfast in Dunkineely and you will come up with nothing.
Margaret O'Kane in one post, defending my saying there was no such bed and breakfast owner, said something like 'oh, I must have been running a dog kennel for the past 20 years'. Dog kennel, run by a female? I hesitate to as that that would be a bitch.
But here's the deal.
If you, Margaret O'Kane, are real then let's meet face to face.
You (clearly) know who I am and where I live.
To you I throw down the challenge.
Tell me where to meet you and meet you I will. Face to face.
And if you ignore this, then I can only assume you are just another of the bogus posters, a figment of John Gill's limited imagination.
WATCH HERE FOR UPDATES PEOPLE.
And readers, check the Voters Roll for County Donegal and the name Margaret O'Kane http://www.donegal.ie/ereg/default.aspx
For MARGARET O'KANE, DUNKINEELY this is the result:
"Your Details could not be found. There are a few possible reasons : You are not on the Register of Electors
Fill in form RFA2 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
You are on the Register of Electors, but your details are incorrect
If you were previously on the Register Of Electors, but have changed address :
Fill in form RFA3 (English Version / Irish Version) , and return to Franchise Office, Donegal County Council, County House, Lifford, Co. Donegal
If your information is incorrect :
Please call Donegal County Councilon 074 9172238
Alternatively, try changing your search criteria and searching again.
Remember, if your house has a number, you must enter it.
SO, Margaret O'Kane, do step forward. Or John Gill just stop wearing ladies clothing and disguising yourself as Margaret O'Kane!
Monday, November 21, 2011
THE STALKING STUPIDS
Honestly, these people from rateyoursolicitor and crookedlawyers (VLPS) are beyond stupid.
They stalk me all over the internet, obsessed as they are with me. They really should consider getting a life that does not include me.
Today, once again they tried to join a forum I am a member of, once again using a ridiculous user name and proxy (poxy?) IP address. This once again exemplifies their supreme stupidity.
To those idiots: YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MY LOVELY FORUM.
Go elsewhere and see if you can find a life. Of sorts.
They stalk me all over the internet, obsessed as they are with me. They really should consider getting a life that does not include me.
Today, once again they tried to join a forum I am a member of, once again using a ridiculous user name and proxy (poxy?) IP address. This once again exemplifies their supreme stupidity.
To those idiots: YOU ARE NOT WELCOME ON MY LOVELY FORUM.
Go elsewhere and see if you can find a life. Of sorts.
Friday, November 18, 2011
BREEDING PUPS
I noticed a post their cesspit site (vlps/crookedlawyers.com) saying I was running a puppy farm, breeding pups for sale.
This is just another of their nasty lies.
1. We have NEVER bought a pup from a puppy farm nor a pet shop.
2. All the dogs we have had were bought as pups from reputable breeders whom we had checked out at length prior to purchasing. By checking out, we made sure that they were Kennel Club (either Irish or British) registered, not because that is a total safety valve, but rather that we could see how many litters they had bred from their dogs and how regularly.
3. We have had many pedigree dogs over the years and have NEVER bred as much as one pup. My opinion is that there are far too many dogs in the world as it is and that is the reason I have never had our dogs bred. And believe me, were I the type to do it, I would have made quite a sum of money as they were all expensive dogs.
4. We have never even allowed our male pedigree dogs to be used at stud. Our Shar-Pei at the time could have earned £800 per breeding and although we were asked by owners in Galway to use our dog, we refused because we a) did not buy our Shar-Pei to make money and b) as stated previously there are far too many puppies being bred.
5. Our dog now is an English Bull Terrier and we have had him now for over seven years. We had him neutered when he was a few months old despite the fact that he could be used at stud as an adult for up to £1,000 a time.
So, no, we have never had a puppy farm and have never bought from one, and more, have never even seen a puppy farm (other than TV progs. of course).
But just another example of the hate campaign and lies against us on their cesspit sites.
To end on a happy note though, here's our fabulous Alf. A charming, loving, clever and very loyal eight stone mass of solid muscle.
This is just another of their nasty lies.
1. We have NEVER bought a pup from a puppy farm nor a pet shop.
2. All the dogs we have had were bought as pups from reputable breeders whom we had checked out at length prior to purchasing. By checking out, we made sure that they were Kennel Club (either Irish or British) registered, not because that is a total safety valve, but rather that we could see how many litters they had bred from their dogs and how regularly.
3. We have had many pedigree dogs over the years and have NEVER bred as much as one pup. My opinion is that there are far too many dogs in the world as it is and that is the reason I have never had our dogs bred. And believe me, were I the type to do it, I would have made quite a sum of money as they were all expensive dogs.
4. We have never even allowed our male pedigree dogs to be used at stud. Our Shar-Pei at the time could have earned £800 per breeding and although we were asked by owners in Galway to use our dog, we refused because we a) did not buy our Shar-Pei to make money and b) as stated previously there are far too many puppies being bred.
5. Our dog now is an English Bull Terrier and we have had him now for over seven years. We had him neutered when he was a few months old despite the fact that he could be used at stud as an adult for up to £1,000 a time.
So, no, we have never had a puppy farm and have never bought from one, and more, have never even seen a puppy farm (other than TV progs. of course).
But just another example of the hate campaign and lies against us on their cesspit sites.
To end on a happy note though, here's our fabulous Alf. A charming, loving, clever and very loyal eight stone mass of solid muscle.
 |
| Alf says "hello" |
DANIEL GALLAGHER'S FATHER'S WILL
Let's clear some things up here.
Daniel Gallagher, represented by his wife Elva (the close friend and constant companion of John Gill, (St. John aka The Lone Ranger aka Dick Turpin) continually bangs on about the Will of Madge Friel and his "ancestoral home" and his imagined entitlements thereto ...
... this post will be completed later today ... hang in there!
Daniel Gallagher, represented by his wife Elva (the close friend and constant companion of John Gill, (St. John aka The Lone Ranger aka Dick Turpin) continually bangs on about the Will of Madge Friel and his "ancestoral home" and his imagined entitlements thereto ...
... this post will be completed later today ... hang in there!
THE STUPID LIES
I know their cesspit sites (rateyoursolictor and crookedlawyers/vlps) are packed with lies but some of them are more stupid than others. Take the following examples:
"Breaking the law seems to run in the McGynn family. I watched the officer of the Court and his accomplice wife down a bottle of alcoholic wine and jump behind the steering wheel of their car and drive into the sunset narrowly escaping the Polestar Roundabout in Letterkenny, Ireland. Clearly they think they are above the drink driving laws of Ireland too."
This post is wrong on so many levels, most importantly the idea that the poster, supposedly a waiter in a local restaurant, would watch customers "down a bottle of alcoholic wine and jump behind the steering wheel of their car" and instead of suggesting a taxi before they did so, or had they failed to, called the gardai to report it, thought: "first thing tomorrow I must post this on a cesspit website?" It doesn't say much about the morals of this poster (were he genuine).
Incidentally, at the date of that post and with a meal over the course of 2 hours such a driver would not have been over the legal limit.But the truth of the matter is that we NEVER take the car if we are having drinks with a meal. A taxi in Letterkenny is only €5 to the restaurant and €5 home. Would anyone really risk an accident or losing their licence for the sake of TEN EURO? Hardly!
And further, at the date of that post we had been out in Letterkenny restaurants on only three occasions in the previous year so I know which restaurants they were and I know the owners and staff who would not have posted such a thing as they ALL know we ALWAYS take taxis.
But ALL that apart, the one thing that shows that this poster is not genuine and has absolutely NO idea of the layout of Letterkenny let alone work here is this:
"and drive into the sunset narrowly escaping the Polestar Roundabout in Letterkenny, Ireland."
Letterkenny town, where the restaurants are located is the the EAST of the Polestar Roundabout.
As everyone (except this poster) knows, the sun sets in the west.
It would therefore be IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to drive into the sunset driving from Letterkenny town to the Polestar Roundabout.
And another ridiculous poster:
"cathrine Mcglynn yet again reversed onto the public road this morning almost killing me and my children! This is a contravention of the Highway code and in breech of the law! Once again she disregards the laws of Ireland. Al other UK drivers adhere to the laws of this country why shouldn't she."
Leaving aside the lack of punctuation and misspellings, clearly this poster is lying. And how do I (and every single person who knows me) know this for a 100% fact?
I DO NOT DRIVE. I can drive but haven't driven in many, many years and I have never driven the car we have now (and have had for a number of years) EVER. And I never drove any of at least the last three cars we have owned.
These people who own and write posts on the sites really need to get at least simple facts right. I know they know nothing about the law but simple things like the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is surely something very basic and not above even their, albeit limited, intelligence
Their limited intelligence is a problem for those people they are advising (payment in cash, tax free don't forget) would be unfortunate enough (especially for those who took their advice and landed in jail) but it also allows the readers of their cesspit sites who know they are lying a laugh at the irony of their (stolen from the Joe Duffy show according to their site) "You Can Never Improve On The Truth".
The quote by Noam Chomsky explains why they lie: "It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the Truth and expose lies."
Using lack of intelligence as a mitigating factor, perhaps they are excused their lies, because, let's face it, between them they scarcely have enough brain power to power a small torch.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
"A NASTY, SCRUFFY, HORRIBLE, LITTLE BULLY"
From the VLPS/crookedlawers guestbook:
"Date: 21/10/2011, 19:56:16 ~ Name: Truth ~ Number: 3,091
Have Victims of The Legal Profession become Victims of John Gill.
The VLPS has been taken control of by a Nasty Scruffy Horrible Little Bully.
The dysfunctionality of The VLPS a victims support group is extrordinary. This guestbook controlled with messages regularly removed, The Rate Your Solicitor Site closed to new postings, public meetings for victims prohibited, no membership registration, no democratically elected management structure, not a single AGM in 10 years and not one genuine victim assisted through the courts to a successful outcome.
Who is John Gill and why is he controlling The VLPS ? ? ?."
Dear Truth
Of course they are all victims of John Gill. But the site has not been taken control of by him, the site is owned, run and more importantly, controlled by him.
John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin), with his friend and close companion, Elva Gallagher, only really want to bang, albeit impotently, their own drums. They care not a jot about other members there other than to take a few quid off them (tax free of course).
Sadly, there are people out there who are innocent enough to actually think this little man can do anything for them. Well, other than land a few of them in jail ~ himself included ~ that is.
John Gill has got exactly nowhere in his own quest to right what he perceives as wrongs against him and now he has the added bother of someone pursuing him for his slanderous rantings. His cup positively overflows.
But he is not totally alone. He always has constant companion and close friend Elva (wife of Daniel Gallagher) but he also has a few "birds of a feather" around him.
People, some of whom are almost illiterate (as evidenced by their writings on his guestbook), and people too who will jump on any bandwagon going to tear others apart ~ as long, of course, as they have the anonymity of the internet and a screen in front of them.
These people, his little band of followers, worship the ground he prances around on as he continues his quest for victory, old, saggy, wrinkly thing by his side (I refer here not to his close friend and constant companion Elva, but rather, his large satchel) over every person and every organisation that ever slighted him in any way. The fact that some of these slights may be figments of his florid imagination is neither here nor there to John Gill.
He is a little man with many big chips scattered between and on both shoulders and a little man who will not give up, driven as he is by his own demons, and cheered on by said band of followers. Some of whom are starting to wonder exactly what they got into when they first believed his diatribes.
But "a nasty, scruffy, horrible little bully"? Well, people can make up their own minds on whether that is a close despcription of him or not.
I tend to think of him as a sad, little man to whom both life and mother nature have dealt some hard blows and because of these he can no longer think, speak nor work with any semblence of rationality.
"Date: 21/10/2011, 19:56:16 ~ Name: Truth ~ Number: 3,091
Have Victims of The Legal Profession become Victims of John Gill.
The VLPS has been taken control of by a Nasty Scruffy Horrible Little Bully.
The dysfunctionality of The VLPS a victims support group is extrordinary. This guestbook controlled with messages regularly removed, The Rate Your Solicitor Site closed to new postings, public meetings for victims prohibited, no membership registration, no democratically elected management structure, not a single AGM in 10 years and not one genuine victim assisted through the courts to a successful outcome.
Who is John Gill and why is he controlling The VLPS ? ? ?."
Dear Truth
Of course they are all victims of John Gill. But the site has not been taken control of by him, the site is owned, run and more importantly, controlled by him.
John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, Dick Turpin), with his friend and close companion, Elva Gallagher, only really want to bang, albeit impotently, their own drums. They care not a jot about other members there other than to take a few quid off them (tax free of course).
Sadly, there are people out there who are innocent enough to actually think this little man can do anything for them. Well, other than land a few of them in jail ~ himself included ~ that is.
John Gill has got exactly nowhere in his own quest to right what he perceives as wrongs against him and now he has the added bother of someone pursuing him for his slanderous rantings. His cup positively overflows.
But he is not totally alone. He always has constant companion and close friend Elva (wife of Daniel Gallagher) but he also has a few "birds of a feather" around him.
People, some of whom are almost illiterate (as evidenced by their writings on his guestbook), and people too who will jump on any bandwagon going to tear others apart ~ as long, of course, as they have the anonymity of the internet and a screen in front of them.
These people, his little band of followers, worship the ground he prances around on as he continues his quest for victory, old, saggy, wrinkly thing by his side (I refer here not to his close friend and constant companion Elva, but rather, his large satchel) over every person and every organisation that ever slighted him in any way. The fact that some of these slights may be figments of his florid imagination is neither here nor there to John Gill.
He is a little man with many big chips scattered between and on both shoulders and a little man who will not give up, driven as he is by his own demons, and cheered on by said band of followers. Some of whom are starting to wonder exactly what they got into when they first believed his diatribes.
But "a nasty, scruffy, horrible little bully"? Well, people can make up their own minds on whether that is a close despcription of him or not.
I tend to think of him as a sad, little man to whom both life and mother nature have dealt some hard blows and because of these he can no longer think, speak nor work with any semblence of rationality.
GIVE THEM ENOUGH ROPE ...
Give them enough rope, as the saying goes.
I haven't been on their cesspit sites for sometime but spent a while recently reading posts and I am glad I did spend a while there.
Now I have both Elva Gallagher and her close friend and companion, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) on open forum setting leaving themselves open to defamation action on many counts.
How strange, yet perfect, that these two very close friends, whilst basking in their own self importance and tied up in their mutual admiration, should be so blinded by the glow of their friendship that they completely lost the run of themselves and their fingers and forgot for a moment that there are other people in the world.
Others who might just have the intelligence to pick up their massive errors.
Yes, enough rope is now given.
I haven't been on their cesspit sites for sometime but spent a while recently reading posts and I am glad I did spend a while there.
Now I have both Elva Gallagher and her close friend and companion, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger and Dick Turpin) on open forum setting leaving themselves open to defamation action on many counts.
How strange, yet perfect, that these two very close friends, whilst basking in their own self importance and tied up in their mutual admiration, should be so blinded by the glow of their friendship that they completely lost the run of themselves and their fingers and forgot for a moment that there are other people in the world.
Others who might just have the intelligence to pick up their massive errors.
Yes, enough rope is now given.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
WHO'S A NAUGHTY BOY?
My husband, that's who.
Unlike me, my husband is normally very even tempered and well mannered. However, recently he was a very naughty boy and I just LOVE him to bits for being so naughty.
After years of ridiculous court appearances in relation to the flogging of a dead horse by Elva Gallagher, and her constant companion and close friend, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, and Dick Turpin), oh and her husband, the much jailed, Daniel, he finally got frustrated with their carry on and he flicked a V at Daniel (he's the husband, not the close companion and friend).
HURRAH! GO SEAN!
I would have done it long ago, but then I am not at all as nice as he.
So, what happened?
In Letterkenny court (High Court on Circuit) recently, and after the Judge had given his decision, Daniel Gallagher (the husband, not the close companion and friend) kept talking at Sean. Sean got annoyed at Daniel's ridiculous behaviour and his loss of the run of himself, and gave him the V.
This threw Daniel into a total tail-spin and he started spluttering and yelling at the Judge whilst pointing to Sean "HE MADE A RUDE GESTURE TO ME!!!". (Not half rude enough in my opion). It was straight from some comedy sketch.
Daniel, the man shocked by a rude gesture, who not more than a number of months ago came to our office with his wife and threatened physical violence, only leaving when the threat of the gardai being called was told to him.
The man too who has refused for the last five years to vacate lands to which he is clearly not entitled, despite several court orders.
And this man and his wife (Elva, the close companion and friend of John Gill) have the cheek to say my husband has no respect for the law?
My husband has every respect for the law but none whatsover for the likes of Daniel and Elva Gallagher who totally ignore it and abuse it.
Unlike me, my husband is normally very even tempered and well mannered. However, recently he was a very naughty boy and I just LOVE him to bits for being so naughty.
After years of ridiculous court appearances in relation to the flogging of a dead horse by Elva Gallagher, and her constant companion and close friend, John Gill (aka St. John, The Lone Ranger, and Dick Turpin), oh and her husband, the much jailed, Daniel, he finally got frustrated with their carry on and he flicked a V at Daniel (he's the husband, not the close companion and friend).
HURRAH! GO SEAN!
I would have done it long ago, but then I am not at all as nice as he.
So, what happened?
In Letterkenny court (High Court on Circuit) recently, and after the Judge had given his decision, Daniel Gallagher (the husband, not the close companion and friend) kept talking at Sean. Sean got annoyed at Daniel's ridiculous behaviour and his loss of the run of himself, and gave him the V.
This threw Daniel into a total tail-spin and he started spluttering and yelling at the Judge whilst pointing to Sean "HE MADE A RUDE GESTURE TO ME!!!". (Not half rude enough in my opion). It was straight from some comedy sketch.
Daniel, the man shocked by a rude gesture, who not more than a number of months ago came to our office with his wife and threatened physical violence, only leaving when the threat of the gardai being called was told to him.
The man too who has refused for the last five years to vacate lands to which he is clearly not entitled, despite several court orders.
And this man and his wife (Elva, the close companion and friend of John Gill) have the cheek to say my husband has no respect for the law?
My husband has every respect for the law but none whatsover for the likes of Daniel and Elva Gallagher who totally ignore it and abuse it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
